MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email: CorruptCourts@gmail.com

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Judge's Affair With Bailiff Ended in Suicide Attempt

Local Associate/Judge's Affair With Bailiff Ended in Suicide Attempt When He Broke It Off
The New Jersey Law Journal by Mary Pat Gallagher - February 6, 2009

Jersey City, N.J., Municipal Court Judge Wilson Campbell has been charged in an ethics complaint with having had an affair with a court worker, who apparently attempted suicide when it ended. In a complaint made public on Thursday, the New Jersey Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct says Campbell, a judge since 2007, had an "intimate relationship" with Ann Kirolos, a bailiff assigned to his courtroom, from April to June last year. The affair came to light after Kirolos took a drug overdose on June 26 and, when asked why, said she was depressed over the break-up, according to the complaint. On June 30, Campbell admitted to the relationship at a meeting with Hudson County Assignment Judge Maurice Gallipoli, trial court administrator, Joseph Davis and Jersey City Municipal Court Chief Judge Nesle Rodriguez, the complaint says. Kirolos was reassigned to another courtroom and placed on different hours so that she would no longer be working at the same time as Campbell.

Though Campbell was not Kirolos' supervisor, he exercised supervisory control over her within his courtroom and thus engaged in an intimate relationship with a subordinate. That was a breach of Canons 1 and 2a, which require judges to observe high standards of conduct and to act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the judiciary, and it was also conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of Rule 2:15-8(a)(6), the complaint says. Campbell declines comment, referring questions to his lawyer, Brian Neary of Hackensack, N.J., who could not be reached. In addition to his part-time judgeship, Campbell is an associate with Sedgwick Detert Moran & Arnold in Newark, representing corporations in commercial, employment, product liability and personal injury litigation.

Campbell, 38, is a 1999 graduate of the Southern University Law Center in Baton Rouge and holds an LL.M. in Trial Advocacy from Temple University's Temple University's James E. Beasley School of Law. He was an assistant counsel in the Department of the Navy's Office of the General Counsel from 1999 to 2002; a part-time assistant staff judge advocate of the U.S. Air Force Reserves from 2002 to 2006; and an assistant U. S. Virgin Islands attorney general chief of its White Collar Division from 2004 to 2006. He was one of several replacements for Jersey City judges accused of improperly dismissing traffic and parking tickets for friends and relatives. They included former Chief Judge Wanda Molina, indicted last July for ticket fixing. The disciplinary case is In the Matter of Wilson J. Campbell, Judge of the Municipal Court, ACJC 2008-17.

24 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just a judge enjoying a perk of his office. She should have been grateful for the attention.

Anonymous said...

Some judges, but not all, let the power go to their head. Those are the one who become corrupt on EVERY level. A guy like this is a piece of garbage and a disgrace to the profession.

Anonymous said...

In NY change word "some" to most. Without enforcement, why shouldn't they put their hand in the cookie jar.

Anonymous said...

The first commentor may be joking..but that comment has been used seriously and viciously, multiple times by employees and judges in Buffal City Court, regarding myself and a disasterous sexual harassment case, where a judge WAS removed in the early 1990's.

The violations stated above(canon 1 and 2a...rule 2:15-8(a)(6) and the related issue of supervision of judicial and non-judicial employees, assigned to work under judicial commands and supervision... all day every day...did become a big issue in my case. OCA wanted to establish that it was a non existent triable situation.
OCA tried for 3 long and painful years, as I continued to work for them and other judges the entire period, to make me the problem somehow, but unsuccessfully, because I did not force my supervisors to address my concerns. OCA defended and supported the charged judge completely, like I was invisible ..even entirely paying his massive "private" and multiple selection of attys and their fees. OCA paid none of mine in the federal case and I had to pay my own personal atty from the CJC actions.

OCA claimed I had 2 office supevisors, one I rarely ever saw and had an alcohol problem, and the other who "claimed" to be my friend, but thought my suffering was appropriate. OCA said they were the ones to whom I was compelled to listen to first and foremost about addressing judicial hostility and any work continuation. Both women...the chief and deputy clerks... did absolutely nothing when told about the 19 months of complaints, and we continue presently with a second federal court litigation.

The judge whose worked I performed in a public forum...courtroom.. to his specifications and demands, was designated by OCA in my action to be ignored..so they said to the CJC....BECAUSE I had these 2 useless supervisors and they were to provide and relate the rules relative to work tolerance of judicial harassment and work continuation if alleged. If not ever alleged, then the judge's orders or abuses suffered all day long... were to absolutely be primary.

This was the most convoluted CJC and legal case I have ever seen or been part of....with OCA unrelenting regarding the non-existent and ineffectiveness of their own suprevisors knowledge and actions, and their inappropriate addressing of and non-compliance with the rules of OCA'S own gender bias commission, and any violations of title vii of the 1964 civil rights act...all RELATIVE TO judicial and non-judicial, non-work related interactions. OCA NY...condones all work related sexual and harassment relationships, this day in.. 2009. The lip service OCA provides regarding their "0" tolerance of this illegal behavior is just for the public's perception..it is not and never has been reality!

I know of more than a few cases of these described relationships,that OCA is very well aware of and has ignored and whitewashed, that are definitely judicial sexual interactions with subordinates... and as a matter of fact some of these female employees are now highly paid supervisors!

I sympathize with the above described employee, even though my desires never took the route of judicial power...which I never felt and frankly cannot comprehend.
I had the misfortune I guess... of viewing them pick their earwax, have verbal orgasms on the bench, hearing them discuss orgasms with me when they had them in their office, and view the "holey" black robe with the sexual act's residual smeared all over it's openings, and cut their nose hairs in front of me.

So I would like to advise this poor employee that her life within the courts will most likely take a very negative personal, and career damaging turn. For her to save her life from more horror and hell and any continued emotional attachments with that judge...she should read what I have written about the NY court sytem and my experience with judicial sexual power... and dump the corrupt court before they continue to take what is left of her happy life, and convert it into serious ruination! I cannot warn anyone enough!

Anonymous said...

The first comment was no joke; it's the NY judicial mindset. If there are honest judges why are their mouths closed?

Anonymous said...

Because their mothers taught them "Never Cheat with your Mouth Open"

Anonymous said...

Are you people serious? Did you actually READ the article? He wasn't her superior and he's not married and neither is she and they are both adults. The only thing he probably did wrong was in not informing his superiors about the, and I hesitate to use the word but for lack of a better one, "relationship" so she could have been removed from his courtroom since they were "involved". However if the affair began in April and they were already broken up by June, was it even at the point that he would feel the need to notify anyone? We're talking roughly 8 weeks here people and that's going by her fatal attraction type timeline. She sounds like a pathetic whiner who didn't ever intend to harm herself, she knows the system and was just trying to get back at him because she probably gave it up too soon and he lost interest. period. And losing interest is not a crime. Leave the man alone, this is why women have problems getting respect today.

Anonymous said...

the person who responded on april 21st should realize that maybe that so called judge is lying just to save his ass. that he probably is not admitting to the whole truth about what happened and when it happened. why would he? his reputation is at stake. as for the fatal attraction attitude, he probably knew she had issues when he chose to get invovled with her. what does that say about him. he exploited her and behaved as if he was picking someone up at a bar

Anonymous said...

"pathetic whiner" and "fatal attraction timeline" why insult her like that? what makes you think she "knows the system"? show some respect. it's so easy to put the blame on her. if a person can't follow the code of conduct, don't be a judge. there are plenty of other professions out there.

Anonymous said...

Hello,nice post thanks for sharing?. I just joined and I am going to catch up by reading for a while. I hope I can join in soon.

Anonymous said...

There are two sides to every story and we need to be fair to everyone, our country is base on fair treatment for everyone stan.
The facts can be seen in this site.

http://www.formerjudgewilsoncampbell.com

court insider said...

At a minimum, it looks like this judge wasn't afforded any Due Process. Is it too much to ask that we give ALL people (yes, including judges) DUE PROCESS. Eric Holder needs to get involved in this one!!!!!

Anonymous said...

ativan online ativan next day side effects - buy lorazepam in uk

Anonymous said...

xanax drug xanax dosage plane - xanax side effects dizziness

Anonymous said...

diazepam cheap diazepam 2mg controlled drug - can i buy diazepam online

Anonymous said...

buy diazepam diazepam to buy online usa - diazepam 10mg mylan

Anonymous said...

diazepam 5mg many 10mg valium get high - order valium online mastercard

Anonymous said...

order xanax xanax withdrawal symptoms sweating - xanax narcotic

Anonymous said...

diazepam 10 mg diazepam dosage and effects - pass drug test diazepam

Anonymous said...

xanax without prescription pill report for xanax - what is xanax usually prescribed for

Anonymous said...

valium online overnight where can i get valium online - buy cheap generic valium

Anonymous said...

buy generic valium online cost of valium medication - ativan vs valium effects

Anonymous said...

buy soma buy somatropin uk - carisoprodol 350 mg - 90 tabs

Anonymous said...

soma 350 mg soma drug movie - carisoprodol typical dosage

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:


               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
         
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2
Add to Technorati Favorites