tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post3504885057705687583..comments2024-02-26T15:57:14.624-05:00Comments on Expose Corrupt Courts: Local Judge’s Frustrated Outburst Creates MistrialCorrupt Courts Administratorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17714272122432325263noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-77349056344530688272011-04-16T13:32:58.690-04:002011-04-16T13:32:58.690-04:00Cute opening line Scheffey, were you thinking of y...Cute opening line Scheffey, were you thinking of yourself as a reporter when you wrote it? <br /><br />"In many professions, reaching quick conclusions based on minimal factual knowledge is a sign of expertise – even wisdom. AND WHICH PROFESSIONS WOULD THOSE BE?? But for a judge, it’s a serious danger. If it appears to be pre-judging – that’s the basic meaning of prejudice."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-28088481715135640552009-08-18T11:33:09.148-04:002009-08-18T11:33:09.148-04:00Shouldn't that 6:44 am post be removed?Shouldn't that 6:44 am post be removed?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-89933770628523325662009-08-18T08:32:56.699-04:002009-08-18T08:32:56.699-04:00In a NY Appellate Court, the judge would have been...In a NY Appellate Court, the judge would have been praised. Think unanimous Appellate support for Brooklyn Judge Garson taking a bribe.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-8518960914387028032009-08-17T22:30:52.063-04:002009-08-17T22:30:52.063-04:00It is very simple: A judge is NOT supposed to be f...It is very simple: A judge is NOT supposed to be frustrated and go into tirades. <br /><br />A judge is not a party to the case other than acting as a fair and impartial trier of the facts. Period.<br /><br />Truth is that a judge should refrain from making any comments before, during, or after the trial. It is only grandstanding to an audience that unless the decision is favorable to them, couldn't care less what the judge has to say.<br /><br />It is my opinion that most appellate courts have oral arguments if not only to puff themselves up as scholars of the law when the decisions have already been made by the clerks and the politcs surrounding the cases. It is nothing more than a lot of showboating, and at considerable expense to the public.<br /><br />If the judges were so concerned about puffing themselves up they should videotape the proceedings so that we all may see them delivering 'justice', as they see it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-47790025576793062382009-08-17T21:33:57.753-04:002009-08-17T21:33:57.753-04:00Give the guy a break. A long break. Remove him fro...Give the guy a break. A long break. Remove him from the bench.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com