tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post1731643313702553666..comments2024-02-26T15:57:14.624-05:00Comments on Expose Corrupt Courts: Marc Dreier Law License SuspendedCorrupt Courts Administratorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17714272122432325263noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-74830819428771396472008-12-24T11:57:00.000-05:002008-12-24T11:57:00.000-05:00I was disbarred because I went after someone who w...I was disbarred because I went after someone who was protected, so it was political payback. Marc Dreier certainly needed to be disbarred years ago. Who protected him? How much did he pay? I have found that that's what the law business is all about.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-69017134821651437442008-12-24T11:27:00.000-05:002008-12-24T11:27:00.000-05:00hey, victim of CJC and attorney grievance - lets s...hey, victim of CJC and attorney grievance - lets start up an organization of fellow people that got screwed by them.<BR/><BR/>I have now had a case before the Grievance Committee on a case that was originally in the 10th, but had been transferred to the 9th. That was supposed to be a good thing. That case has been there for more than 18 months without resolution. It is pretty clear cut - did the two attorneys do wrong or didnt they.<BR/><BR/>As you know all submissions made to the grievance committee are made in writing. all responses by them to you are in writing. For all you know your letters could be going to the Wizard of OZ.<BR/><BR/>The original charge was made against what could be called a 'connected' lawyer that represented two different clients at different times, and had the second one give testimony against the first client. The first client was not indicted, but mentioned as an unindicted co-defendant for the purpose of indicting another person. The lawyer does not dispute he worked for client number one. He said he got 5K, not as an attorney, but acting as a 'research assistant' for another attorney. He said he imparted no confidential information to his second client. The threshold for immproper conduct is that one ONLY has to have the ability to impart information - <BR/><BR/>While presenting that charge to the grievance committee, they appeared to have opened up a case against the assistant DA. The ADA admits to the jury, and then to the grievance committee that the ADA knew when he heard the false testimony given by his witness he never bothered to inform the court or the defense. He then goes on to make a case to the GC to support the idea HE KNEW. Incredible. You just can't do that.<BR/><BR/>Truth is the matter should be appealed as to the criminal conviction. But the system is so screwed up that one takes the time because they can't afford to appeal and appeal. <BR/><BR/>Bottom LINE: they are all corrupt. There is NOT a one of them in any phase of the government that will shout out: " I can't take it anymore!!!"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-4248971488079338312008-12-24T02:13:00.000-05:002008-12-24T02:13:00.000-05:00he will get 6 months in a min security prison only...he will get 6 months in a min security prison only because his ealings with Canada. Then when hhe gets out he will re-apply for his Lic. and they will gladly give it back as long as he pays his 3,000 a year in hush money to the Barr.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-39561530758124028472008-12-24T00:46:00.000-05:002008-12-24T00:46:00.000-05:00Oh Please, there were so many Attorney Grievance c...Oh Please, there were so many Attorney Grievance complaints filed, and CJC complaints filed that were "WHITE-WASHED" for the "Politically" connected lawyers...They pay their dues and magically the complaints disappear or they keep them lingering on for years without suspension, censure, or disbarment, even though the complainants have incontrovertible evidence against these lawyers and Judges, they still seem to disappear without any reason...These Agencies need Federal Monitoring and or have the public people decide their fate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-13571467465871082622008-12-23T22:11:00.000-05:002008-12-23T22:11:00.000-05:00Show trial. Convict the undeniable and let the ot...Show trial. Convict the undeniable and let the other guilty rats escape. What about the partners who are responsible for inaction or complicity? What about all the other corruption cases presented to the Committee? Without virtue; without decency; without honor; NY lawyers and judges; CJC and and attorney discipline.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-33830161575013303012008-12-23T20:40:00.000-05:002008-12-23T20:40:00.000-05:00Now who said the Committee doesn't do its job? Her...Now who said the Committee doesn't do its job? Here you go. LOL, not even they could 86 this one. They call that one a no-brainer. It is a feeble attempt to make it look like they actually are doing their job.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com