tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post1817940806399430219..comments2024-02-26T15:57:14.624-05:00Comments on Expose Corrupt Courts: Judge's Signature Stamps Secured After Clerk's Forgery Arrest (MORE, CLICK HERE)Corrupt Courts Administratorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17714272122432325263noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-26124650905238733742008-05-01T01:08:00.000-04:002008-05-01T01:08:00.000-04:00I agree with "retired clerk" - this has indeed bee...I agree with "retired clerk" - this has indeed been going on forever. <BR/><BR/>In Westchester County, there's a signed court order from Judge Nick Colabella dated the day he was under anesthesia for prostrate surgery (I think this was in July 2002). Now how could he have signed a court order when he was under anesthesia? <BR/><BR/>Who forged his signature? And what idiot in the county clerk's office accepted this order for filing without questioning this?<BR/><BR/>(And yes, I know who did this).<BR/><BR/>So, if a judge doesn't read motion papers (and they don't, the Law Secretaries do), and the judge doesn't write the court order (same answer - hard to write anyway while holding a golf club), and finally, they don't even sign those orders since their staff is forging their signatures, then are they really valid court orders?<BR/><BR/>What constitutes a valid court order?<BR/><BR/>Wouldn't this all be easily prevented if the judges were made to go to the County Clerk's offices with their orders to sign them in person before the clerk? And have the clerk's signature on these orders as "official witness". <BR/><BR/>Baring this, shouldn't the county clerk at least verify signatures (and if the judge was even in court on the date of signature) before filing these orders into the official record? Where's the due diligence and cross-auditing here? <BR/><BR/>But what do I know. I'm just an ex-auditor.Katehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09303268888416494312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-12165768517125247242008-04-02T02:02:00.000-04:002008-04-02T02:02:00.000-04:00This particular clerk is guilty of far more than w...This particular clerk is guilty of far more than what she is being charged with and she was being protected by more than one of the supervisors at that court. When some of the clerks that worked there reported her for things in the past, retribution was swift from her supervisor protectors. My only hope is that more of the guilty will see justice from this incident.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-79183871607269725142008-03-24T21:52:00.000-04:002008-03-24T21:52:00.000-04:00all of a sudden this becomes public and everyone g...all of a sudden this becomes public and everyone gets excited, this has been going on openly for everAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com