tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post4641086743120522057..comments2024-02-26T15:57:14.624-05:00Comments on Expose Corrupt Courts: U.S. Supreme Court Rules on 'Buying' CourtsCorrupt Courts Administratorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17714272122432325263noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-48010963650786556082009-06-10T21:37:45.157-04:002009-06-10T21:37:45.157-04:00courts for sale..... wow....courts for sale..... wow....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-30968056335810460892009-06-10T09:14:02.538-04:002009-06-10T09:14:02.538-04:00I AM not buying what they are selling!!!I AM not buying what they are selling!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-81391890235405632412009-06-10T09:04:55.525-04:002009-06-10T09:04:55.525-04:00So let me get this straight..
Judiciary Law 487 a...So let me get this straight..<br /><br />Judiciary Law 487 applies to all "Officers of the Court"?? Judges as well as Lawyers... <br /><br />and I'm supposed to Appeal from their crimes??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-78101174187456533652009-06-09T20:04:34.181-04:002009-06-09T20:04:34.181-04:00the judges will say So go appeal it, spend your mo...the judges will say So go appeal it, spend your money and waste your time. I'm still a judges so screw you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-47555223814157281412009-06-09T11:00:12.573-04:002009-06-09T11:00:12.573-04:00Maybe not so bad..
From the decision.. is it saf...Maybe not so bad..<br /><br /><br />From the decision.. is it safe to assume that when a Judge violates the more rigorous standards of recusal adopted by a State as it pertains to bias and prejudice...<br /><br />and where Objective Evidence and Objective Information of that Bias and Prejudice is present in the record...<br /><br />a violation of Due Process has occurred?<br /><br />*This may also be good for Richard I. Fine...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-24729596875238427532009-06-09T10:20:20.402-04:002009-06-09T10:20:20.402-04:00Back in the 70's and 80's judges I worked ...Back in the 70's and 80's judges I worked for were adamant about recusing themselves in cases where they even bought bread from someone that appeared in front of them or if a litigant/deft waived at them from a vehicle!<br /><br />Today.. recusals seem to only come when the judge does not want to make a tough decision or critical politics are involved...which might weigh in on their future to continue on the bench forever!<br /><br /> These present cases no longer beg for recusal when they should, esp since the Kaye era ..because the power and influence judges get from ruling in favor of people they know...outweighs the lowly personal and lifetime clear conscience that engages with integrity and ethics.<br /><br /> The judges can drink those nagging feelings of immorality and corruption away...as many do that I have watched. Drugs also play a significant part in numbing the conscience...but many police officers have mentioned to me that they let these judges/lawyers go when caught..because of that very same profession. In the mind of the coppers... they view that they will almost always need them for huge favors....esp for matrimonials..which they have many!<br /><br />I see the issue of recusal because of donations of large sums of money to judges as confusing...since as it is mentioned ,it would be difficult for anyone to know but the judge and the litigant who donated and who won't speak up..judges do know all their big donors, for sure. ...thus everyone else would be ignorant to the fact or the amount.... and it will go un-addressed.<br /><br />I sometimes wish that addressing these hard to diagnose symtoms within the judiciary would just not get attention. We need to just move on to total re-vamping of the American judicial system and start utilizing citizen ideas and their intelligent vote...and sway from getting determinations about courts from other robes..whose only purpose is to protect their own positions and convolute simple ethics and morality!<br /><br />I am uninterested in this decision because it thirsts for way too much more that could have been ruled upon, that would have been meaningful to myself and other Americans.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com