tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post6568411634837478395..comments2024-02-26T15:57:14.624-05:00Comments on Expose Corrupt Courts: The Supreme Court's Judgment Isn't AbsoluteCorrupt Courts Administratorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17714272122432325263noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-72417669880439944862012-01-05T06:47:24.848-05:002012-01-05T06:47:24.848-05:00As the Supreme Court itself says "We are not ...As the Supreme Court itself says "We are not here to correct the mistakes of lower the Courts"kris sergentakishttp://www.leukemiascandal.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-81976627004759814772012-01-03T09:49:39.230-05:002012-01-03T09:49:39.230-05:00@9:25 The Dred Scott decision was just the standar...@9:25 The Dred Scott decision was just the standard Supreme Court summary order (still in use today) where the clerk just fills in the name or race.<br /><b>"blacks (or fill in the name) had no rights a white man (or fill in a judge, the government, the judge's crony)was bound to respect"</b> <br /> There are untold numbers of people who had their constitutional rights taken away and were denied relief by the Supreme Court. Also,this Chief Judge and the two before him have failed in their responsibilities to supervise their courts and act against federal judicial corruption known to them. The Supreme Courts is a corrupt cabal protecting the judge insiders.<br />The People's summary judgement of the Court should be, "The Supreme Court has no order which any decent man need respect."Been to the Supreme Court twicenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-45113935533200747282012-01-03T09:25:15.293-05:002012-01-03T09:25:15.293-05:00I'm no expert, but wasn't the Supreme Cour...I'm no expert, but wasn't the Supreme Court suppose to be the one court in the United States where anyone could go to make sure their Constitutional rights were protected?<br /><br />Every person in the US is supposed to have their rights protected, not just the couple of people and cases the Supreme Court decides to hear each year. <br /><br />So, could it be that the Supreme Court picks and chooses what it's responsibilities are? It certainly has no problem letting everyone know that there are many cases that have merit that it won't hear. Wouldn't that mean that there are untold numbers of people who have had their Constitutional rights violated and they know it and they just don't care?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4467242822928099777.post-45559364103382094342012-01-03T05:43:44.410-05:002012-01-03T05:43:44.410-05:00It was bad enough that some decent judges thought ...It was bad enough that some decent judges thought they were gods but now corrupt judges think they are gods. In truth they are devils... pure evil. Houston, we have a problem.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com