Wednesday, May 26, 2010

The Big National Problem: Oversight Conflicts

Our view on the BP oil spill: Gulf pays price for laxity at minerals oversight agency
USA TODAY by Patrick Semansky, AP - May 25, 2010

"This is a sad but familiar story. Nearly every recent national debacle has featured what's known as "regulatory capture" — agencies that become too cozy with industries they're supposed to oversee."

USA TODAY OPINION

Opinions expressed in USA TODAY's editorials are decided by its Editorial Board, a demographically and ideologically diverse group that is separate from USA TODAY's news staff. Most editorials are accompanied by an opposing view — a unique USA TODAY feature that allows readers to reach conclusions based on both sides of an argument rather than just the Editorial Board's point of view. Before BP's disastrous oil spill, the last time the obscure federal Minerals Management Service made news was in 2008, when investigators uncovered old-fashioned sleaze at an MMS office in Denver. Workers there accepted football tickets, golf games and ski outings from energy companies. They partied with oil and gas representatives, drank their booze, took illegal drugs and even had sexual relations with some. The scandal gave new meaning to the old expression about regulators being "in bed with the industry," but the juicy details obscured deeper problems within the agency, which, as part of the Interior Department, is supposed to regulate and oversee oil drilling. Instead, the agency ceded much of its role to the very companies it was supposed to watch. Now, the nation — the Gulf Coast in particular — is paying the price.

This is a sad but familiar story. Nearly every recent national debacle has featured what's known as "regulatory capture" — agencies that become too cozy with industries they're supposed to oversee. The financial meltdown? Regulators twiddled while banks developed products so complex the government didn't know how to police them. Toyota's sticky gas pedals? Regulators let the automaker downplay the issue for years — until the deaths of a California family in a runaway Lexus forced them to act. Tainted food from abroad? Holes in oversight of imports. Lax airline inspections? George W. Bush's aviation administrator saw the companies she regulated as "customers." We could go on, but you get the idea. In drilling regulation, the lax culture goes back years. MMS was charged with both collecting royalties from oil production and enforcing safety rules that might impede oil production. It was a conflict from the get-go. During the Bush and Obama administrations, MMS repeatedly tossed aside warnings from government scientists about environmental risks of drilling, pushing instead to approve energy exploration quickly. Beyond that, regulators relied on the industry's word that accidents and environmental damage were unlikely, that the industry had backup systems if an accident occurred and that, if all else failed, the industry could contain the damage. The catastrophic April 20 explosion of BP's Deepwater Horizon drilling rig put the lie to all these assumptions. Regulatory lapses, failures of imagination and complacency have put BP in the position of a fire department trying to build trucks on the way to a five-alarm blaze. It's unclear how much fault lies with the Obama administration, which inherited the lax and conflicted MMS and is moving to separate its missions. Even so, the Deepwater drilling permit was approved last May, on the watch of President Obama and his Interior secretary, Ken Salazar. And it was Obama who, on March 31, moved to allow more offshore drilling in areas previously off limits. Such a policy still makes sense as a way to reduce America's disastrous dependence on foreign oil while it develops alternative energy sources. Before more exploration begins, though, the nation has to be assured that drilling is safe and overseen by a real watchdog, not a trusting friend to the oil industry.

6 comments:

  1. Please send this article to Lippman, Cuomo, Silver, Sampson, Cassella, Friedberg, Cahill, Cohen, Prudenti, Gonzalez and Patterson.

    ReplyDelete
  2. the first thing they did was send out lawyers and lobbyists.Shutting the well down is not that inportant. Look at what Exxon did. 20 years later they still were in court. The people were never made whole. The pools of oil is still thier. The fishing is still ruined, the wildlife has not been able to recover. If they did this in China they would go to jail.
    Thier will never be fishing in the gulf for decades, the coral of the florida coast will be ruined.
    So will the birds and the fish.
    More than 30 days after the well cought on fire thier is still no rush. They say maybe August, look how many lawyers are working 24/7 to limit thier liability
    They should indict the CEO of BP.
    Until they threaten them with jail
    nothing will happen. Obama talks about sending them to jail watch how fast they shut the well off.

    ReplyDelete
  3. it's all coverup, coverup, and more coverups!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rerun of the same play as the "NY Justice's Cabal," just the names of the characters and the location have changed. Just like in NY, where a corrupt Commission on Judicial Conduct is in the pocket of the corrupt judges, we have corrupt government regulators feeding at the same trough as those they regulate. Like our NY Attorney Discipline Committees which can only bring themselves to punish the victims of their lawyer cronies, the federal regulators wish only to ingratiate themselves with those they believe will reward them when they leave as public servants. And just like in NY, this well explosion attracts swarms of lawyer vermin which will suck all the money into their trough until not enough is left to feed a few remaining snails on the beach.
    Take a sip of the kool-aid and go to sleep; everything is under the supervision of a Harvard lawyer, who immediately sent SWAT teams with lawyers and who will use his experience as the largest receiver of money from BP for twenty years. And sleep well knowing Chief Judge Lippman is running court administration in NY. And wake with joyful heart, because Cuomo has asked you to join him to remove corruption from NY, which had ignored because he didn't have support for his public integrity unit as AG.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Surrogate Ct. VictimMay 26, 2010 at 9:42 PM

    WHAT OVERSIGHT? THE PROBLEM IS THAT 'WE DON'T HAVE NO SINKING OVERSIGHT!' Cuomo et al., including the Feds don't do a damn thing, but cover-up and obstruct. Example number one - MADOFF! The VICTIMS rest our case! Thewhole system is a big fraud, please prove me wrong!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Andrew Cuomo has provided no oversight during his tenure as the Attorney General of NY. Let's look at the record, I rest my case. Now he wants to be Governor, can you beat that!

    ReplyDelete