Federal Judge Faces Impeachment Over Claim He Took Cash From Lawyers in Pending Case
The National Law Journal by Pamela A. MacLean - June 20, 2008
The federal judiciary's top administrative body has asked the U.S. House of Representatives to consider impeachment of U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous of Louisiana, alleging that he "solicited and received" cash from lawyers in a pending case. The allegations stemming from an internal judicial investigation of Porteous go beyond what was previously disclosed in a 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals inquiry in 2007, when he was accused of perjury and false financial disclosures to conceal cash in a bankruptcy case. In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct against U.S. District Judge Porteous, 07-05-351-0085. The Judicial Conference of the United States, the federal judiciary's policymaking body, sent its determination to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a letter June 18 that "consideration of impeachment may be warranted." The Judicial Conference letter cited not only allegations of repeated perjury in financial disclosure in a bankruptcy case, but also violation of criminal law and ethical canons while presiding over In re: Liljeberg enters, Inc. v. Lifemark Hospitals, Inc., No. 2:93-cv-1784. The case was partially reversed by the 5th Circuit in, 304 F.3d 410 (2002). In the bench trial, Porteous rejected a recusal motion and allegedly failed to disclose "that the lawyers in question had often provided him with cash. Thereafter, while a bench verdict was pending, he solicited and received from the lawyers appearing before him illegal gratuities in the form of cash and other things of value," the letter states. Porteous was not available for comment, according to his chambers staff. "This is as serious an accusation as you can make against a federal judge," said Arthur Hellman, professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law who has studied and written extensively on judicial discipline.
"I expect that the House Judiciary Committee will proceed quickly with an impeachment inquiry, and if these allegations are substantiated, Judge Porteous will be impeached, convicted and removed from office -- unless he resigns first," Hellman said. "Now that the Judicial Conference has completed its review of Judge Porteous's actions, the House Judiciary Committee will promptly review the materials provided by the Conference and determine what further action should be taken in this matter," said Representative John Conyers Jr., chairman of the committee, D-Mich. Ranking Republican on the committee, Lamar Smith, R-Texas, also said in a prepared statement that Republicans would work with the Democrats to ensure "expeditious and appropriate action is taken." Porteous was appointed by President Clinton in 1994. He was a former Louisiana state judge for the 10 years preceding his appointment and served as the city attorney in Harahan, La.
MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"
End Corruption in the Courts!
Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email: CorruptCourts@gmail.com
Most Read Stories
- Tembeckjian's Corrupt Judicial 'Ethics' Commission Out of Control
- As NY Judges' Pay Fiasco Grows, Judicial 'Ethics' Chief Enjoys Public-Paid Perks
- New York Judges Disgraced Again
- Wall Street Journal: When our Trusted Officials Lie
- Massive Attorney Conflict in Madoff Scam
- FBI Probes Threats on Federal Witnesses in New York Ethics Scandal
- Federal Judge: "But you destroyed the faith of the people in their government."
- Attorney Gives New Meaning to Oral Argument
- Wannabe Judge Attorney Writes About Ethical Dilemmas SHE Failed to Report
- 3 Judges Covered Crony's 9/11 Donation Fraud
- Former NY State Chief Court Clerk Sues Judges in Federal Court
- Concealing the Truth at the Attorney Ethics Committee
- NY Ethics Scandal Tied to International Espionage Scheme
- Westchester Surrogate's Court's Dastardly Deeds
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(545)
-
▼
June
(45)
- Lawyer's Phony Letter Could Get Her Disbarred
- Washington Post Editorial: Bias in High Places
- Federal Judge: "The justice system made you a rich...
- Federal Judge Bribery Scheme Gets Lawyer 5 Years
- Kaye Scholer Hit with Malpractice Suit
- Complaints Against New York Judges Reach a High
- Court Revives Malpractice Suit Against NY Firm
- Committee On Attorney Conduct Selects Chairman of ...
- The Wall Street Journal: Checks and Judicial Balances
- AP: Lawyers Were Greedy, Alcoholic or Simple-Minde...
- Manhattan Prosecutor's Shocker
- Probe of Manhattan DA's Prosecutorial Misconduct W...
- NY Times EDITORIAL: NY’s justice system has falle...
- Federal Judge Faces Impeachment
- The Heads Start to Role; Public Administrator and ...
- 10th Ethics Federal Lawsuit Filed
- Who Should Be NY's Next Chief Judge?
- Taste of Prison Leaves NY Pol Chatty
- Judicial Reports: Policing the Judge Police: Part II
- Ex-Milberg Partners Sue Crooked Colleagues
- For Immediate Release: Committee Formed to Review ...
- NY Sun Editorial on Judge Ordering Himself a Raise
- N.Y. Judge Orders Himself a Raise
- Order-Self-Raise Judge Known for Pooper-Scooper Law
- 1st Issue of NY Commission on Public Integrity !
- Actor Joins Abuse of Dead in New York
- More on Picking the Bones of the Dead
- Federal Judge Asks to Be Removed
- Lawyer in judicial bribery case objects to report
- Washington Post: Judge Assailed Over Sexually Expl...
- Judge orders raises for New York judges
- U.S. Attorney: "Justice Not for Sale" in Lawyer Ob...
- FBI Removes Files from Albany Office of Ex-GOP Boss
- Russia Trumps U.S. in Cleaning Up Court Corruption
- Daily News Editorial: Green light for corruption
- Update on Westchester Surrogate's Court's Dastardl...
- Federal Judge: "But you destroyed the faith of the...
- Court System, not Judge, has 'irretrievably lost' ...
- Memo to Commission on Judicial Conduct: What about...
- Too Many Lawyer Factories and More on the Way
- AG Andrew Cuomo Planning Amnesty for State Judges ...
- Attorney Weiss gets prison in kickback scheme
- Keeping dark secrets
- U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Retaliation Lawsuits
- Indicted Chicago Cop Shines Light on Corruption
-
▼
June
(45)
See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
7 comments:
The bad, corrupt habits, procedures and people that have polluted the NY state court system-- and other state court systems-- have, over time, leaked into the once-respected federal court system. Maybe this Louisiana judge getting the hook will prove to be a lesson to the rest of the federal judges across the US.
I truly do not believe that many people realize how potent NY STATE and all of their government agencies really are. These entities influence states throughout this country, and that is why I believe that our judicial system remaining corrupt, recklessly continues to present this corruption as a way to operate!
All of these other states and their governments take such risks, rationalizing... if NY can do this and get away with it..why can't we. Especially, since their taxpayers and workers are a lot less sophisticated, and are easier to convince and less likely to recognize what these agencies conceal!
NY STATE SETS THE PACE FOR THIS COUNTRY IN MANY WAYS..WE NEED TO CLEAN UP CORRUPTION TODAY!
I don't know all the facts in this matter, however, it is a sad day in my mind when any federal Judge is in this situation. I pray for him and his family.
my father always told me not to trust any Judge, he said they were all dirty. He had a good friend who was a Judge and he heard all the stories direct from him. Nothing changes, it all the same.
the Culture of Corruption has been spread across the country by greed.
this harlot faces only "IMPEACHMENT" he should be thrown out on his fat ASS! He should have NO PENSION! Make it hurt that way it doesn't happen again.
have come to the conclusion that ALL candidates for any Judgeships should be required to pass extensive psychological testing. It's the only way to gain the public trust back.
Post a Comment