MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email:

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Ethics Law on Trial

Ethics laws on trial
Statutes will get scrutiny in Bruno case opening today
The Albany Times Union by JAMES M. ODATO - November 2, 2009

As the trial of former Senate Majority Leader Joseph L. Bruno begins today, state ethics laws, as much as the powerful Republican leader himself, will be on trial. Prosecutors have shown they intend to dissect New York's public officers law and disclosure laws, and many onlookers are eager to see the weaknesses in those laws laid bare. "I always felt the disclosure laws were lacking in transparency and given the rules on outside employment ... you needed the corresponding disclosure into those relationships," said Michael Garcia, who stepped down at the end of 2008 as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. His office became the most aggressive to prosecute Albany lawmakers in corruption cases in years and won convictions through guilty pleas. Garcia said the Bruno case will be a positive thing for Albany. "I always felt we were close to reform -- one more case, one more event would quite possibly put it over the edge to real reform," Garcia said. "None of those cases ever went to trial. Maybe a public airing of the rules and facts will cause people to re-engage in the reform debate."

New York's ethics codes aren't the worst.

The state received a "C" grade in an analysis by the Center for Public Integrity of standards required of state lawmakers nationwide. The state's history suggests public outrage over corruption scandals can propel action on ethics laws. After exposure of Democratic Party racketeering in the 1980s, state lawmakers created the integrity laws now in place after voters and leaders pushed for change. With the passage of time showing those laws to be inadequate, many lawmakers, public policy experts and government reform advocates are focusing on the Bruno trial to spark meaningful reform. The use of the federal honest services statute against New York elected officials already caused a rethinking of financial disclosure laws this legislative session. A plan passed in the Assembly stalled and compromises are under negotiation. Bruno, 80, of Brunswick, is a 32-year Senate veteran who rose to lead the chamber from 1995 to 2008. He gave up his powerful post and quit amid a federal investigation of his outside business interests. He is charged with not fully disclosing his consulting activities and representation of investment companies that involved people and groups having business before the state. His activities made him millions of dollars for barely doing any work, according to federal investigators, and the income did not have to be disclosed on financial forms lawmakers must fill out every year.

Indeed, New York does not require disclosure of business clients, sums of money earned privately, or even how the money is earned. Some states require such disclosure. A few require lawmakers, even lawyers, to name clients. This summer, lawmakers began attempts to update the Ethics in Government Act of 1987. The 22-year-old legislation was a response to scandals that rocked the Democratic Party and climaxed with the suicide of Donald Manes, the Queens borough president under investigation in a kickback scheme. The dramatic Manes story became national news. Well-known Syracuse Mayor Lee Alexander was under investigation for his own kickback scheme and pleaded guilty to charges in 1987. Assemblyman G. Oliver Koppell, who later was appointed attorney general, led a committee that recommended the ethics legislation that became the backbone of the "landmark" laws governing public officials. Koppell, now a New York councilman, also is a lawyer with an outside business practice. He said he would want to protect client identities but doesn't mind if income from law practices becomes a disclosable detail. "It's good to review things in light of experience and problems that may have evidenced themselves," he said. His bill more than two decades ago arose when the public, Gov. Mario M. Cuomo and newspaper editorials demanded reform. It passed in both houses easily, causing some lawmakers to weep at its substance. Yet Cuomo vetoed it, saying the rules didn't go far enough. After negotiation, lawmakers worked out a compromise. They persuaded him to agree to a separation-of-powers argument. Cuomo instituted a tougher ethics program for executive branch officials policed by an ethics commission. The Legislature set up its own regulator, a Legislature-controlled body.

"The Legislature's ethics agency is a toady agency, a disaster," said Blair Horner, legislative director for the New York Public Interest Research Group. The commission and the in-house ethics panel set up by the Legislature has shown little evidence of policing members, although its operations are mostly confidential. Horner said it has been too easy for lawmakers to go afoul: "If you're based on an honor system and you see others gaming the system, you say: 'Why can't I go one more step beyond what is allowed?' It's the Wild West without U.S. marshals, it's the lawlessness of state ethics where state officials wittingly or unwittingly break the law." Attempts to create new laws broke down in September when the Senate squabbled over passing a plan advanced by Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and co-sponsored by Assembly Minority Leader Brian Kolb, R-Canandaigua. The measure calls for revealing ranges of income of lawmakers. It would require lobbyists and clients of lobbyists to disclose business relationships with public officials and set up a new executive branch ethics commission and new lobbying commission. Gov. David Paterson is pushing for what he calls a better plan. The Senate failed to pass the bill after Sen. John Sampson proposed an amendment that included tougher campaign finance enforcement. Missing from the legislation is the broad disclosure of the special interest group relationships and clients of lawyers, such as Silver, who is a practicing attorney. "Are we going to require that lawyers and real estate brokers disclose their clients? How far do we go? And accountants having to disclose their clients?" said Assemblywoman RoAnn Destito, D-Rome. "Then this is no longer going to be a legislature that allows outside clients. That would have a monumental impact on whether we remain a part-time legislature or if we transition into a full-time legislature." Lawyer Mark Davies, who runs New York City's Conflicts of Interest Board, said the disclosure requirements need a major overhaul, such as rewriting disclosure forms so they solicit more details that point out the potential for conflicts. Many doubt whether the Legislature has the will to make heavy revisions. Barbara Grumet, a veteran ethics professor who worked at Russell Sage College, is now a conflict-of-interest watchdog at a City University of New York technology college. "I think we need more disclosure, but it's politicians who decide on changing the rules and setting up the mechanisms for changing the rules," she said. "I'm not optimistic we're going to get greater disclosure." James M. Odato can be reached at 454-5083 or

Trial facts

When: The trial is scheduled to start at 9 a.m. Monday, 1st floor courtroom, U.S. District Court, 445 Broadway, just north of the bottom of State Street, Albany.Best bet: Arrive by 8:30 a.m. First-come, first-served seating for about four dozen. Tip: Leave cell phones, computers, cameras and recording devices at home. Be ready to pass through metal detectors at the door and hand over most electronic devices to security personnel for safe-keeping. Parking: Either bring plenty of quarters for on-street meter spaces or find lots such as Columbia Street Garage at Columbia Street between Broadway and Water Street. -- James M. Odato


I know Mike said...

Ethics and Garcia should not be used in the same article. It was Michael Garcia that allowed the corruption in NY to get as bad as it is.

Anonymous said...

Today's Daily News

'Lawsuit claims court-appointed lawyer swindled handicapped woman, senior'

Anonymous said...

Ethics in NY - 'we anit got no stinking ethics in NY'

Anonymous said...

Bernadette E. Lupinetti, Esq. is the bigger fixer in Orange County. This woman is a child abuser and belongs behind bars for her collaboration in endagering the wellfare of minors. OINK OINK OINK!!!

Anonymous said...

Bernadette E. Lupinetti, Esq. is the bigger fixer in Orange County. This woman is a child abuser and belongs behind bars for her collaboration in endagering the wellfare of minors. OINK OINK OINK!!!

Anonymous said...

lawyers should disclose their clients and produce a 1099,
that will prove the deceit
I doubt they even account for half the money that comes in.....

Anonymous said...

if you can take in cash on a client, that means you can pay out cash........
1099 from lawyers
and we wonder why our laws are not changed, and who makes the most campaign contributions, lawyers!

Eliot Bernstein said...

Steven C. Krane of Proskauer and former Chief JudgeDread Judith Kaye and now the new crew have been slowly rewriting the ethics codes in this country to disable ethics. Take a look at what is going around in the country since the deregulation of ethics.
Monsters we have created by trusting those in ethics to be ethical, monsters we must now destroy before they destroy many for few.
I looked deep into the eyes of Thomas Cahill, Sherry Cohen, Spocockney and Mazerelli and they were hard and vicious and evil, this is what is in charge of ethics, the Gestapo. Through their new generation Himmler's like John McConnell, fear for the children.
Ethics is the most esteemed job for those with kind hearts who love the law and love the country and believe in our democracy. The animals in charge are what have allowed a steady decline in Wallstreet Regulation, allowed the deregulation of war ethics to allow torture and murder and war of agression, the deregulation of antitrust protections allowing the few to own the mass, the deregulation of court justice to allow courts to convene in conflict and profit from the pains of others, deregulation of justice so as to allow criminals to walk - above the law.
It all begins and ends with the ethics departments in this country and the criminals are running them and changing the laws quickly to make their crimes ok. They even tried to change torture laws, yes our trusted lawyers and politicians. If you allow them this inch they will...and next you will be fearing it will be you and your children next.
All of these people for all of these crimes would be in jail but with no one guarding the ethics henhouse, well you know. Sheep Beware, Fox take Cover.
Wonder where their souls went, it must suck to do these things and live with yourself after. That's why Cahill is a Gin head and his wife did not attend a day of trial

Anonymous said...

Ethics requires the fear of the wrath of God. These swine don't fear a God, so they need to fear the wrath of the people.

SuaSponteRelief! said...

Welcome to New York...

we are both ethically and structurally DEFECTIVE!!!

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:

               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2
Add to Technorati Favorites