MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email: CorruptCourts@gmail.com

Thursday, January 17, 2008

U.S. Supreme Court: Fixed Judicial Elections OK in NY (MORE, CLICK HERE)

A Defeat for Judicial Reform
The New York Times - EDITORIAL
January 17, 2008

By upholding New York’s machine-dominated system for selecting judges, the Supreme Court has dealt another setback to voters. The court has once again allowed political bosses to rig elections in ways that deny voters a meaningful role. New York’s political power brokers are no doubt cheering, but they should not be allowed to triumph. Even if New York’s method of selecting judges is constitutional, it remains unfair and undemocratic. It needs to be replaced.

New York State Supreme Court justices — who despite their titles are trial-level judges — are selected through a byzantine process. Primary voters select judicial delegates, who then meet in party conventions to choose their nominees. The conventions are generally controlled by political bosses, who often steer the nominations to candidates who deliver patronage back to the party machine. It’s a disgraceful way to choose judges. They are supposed to be above politics.

It’s also a system that makes the voters almost irrelevant. At the polls, they have to choose among judicial delegate slates — when there are competing slates at all — filled with unfamiliar names. It is a far cry from an actual party primary in which voters are allowed to choose among competing judicial candidates. The New York-based United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in ruling against the system, declared that it unacceptably burdened the constitutional rights of both candidates and voters.

The Supreme Court, unfortunately, disagreed. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, dismissed the idea that the right of association requires a process by which voters have a meaningful opportunity to affect an election’s outcome. The ruling is consistent with the court’s recent decisions upholding the right of political bosses to gerrymander political districts. These days, the only election complaints that seem to move the court are ones by corporations and wealthy individuals who object to limits on their ability to spend on elections.

Four justices, in concurring opinions, cast doubt on the wisdom of New York’s method of choosing judges. Justices Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer noted that if the rules “do not produce both the perception and the reality of a system committed to the highest ideals of the law, they ought to be changed and to be changed now.” Justices John Paul Stevens and David Souter quoted Thurgood Marshall: “The Constitution does not prohibit legislatures from enacting stupid laws.”

A stupid — and undemocratic — law is precisely what New York has. Now that the cudgel of a court order has been removed, we hope the Legislature will summon the wisdom and integrity to fix the system voluntarily.

The odds of that happening are long, since the powers that be in the Legislature are the same ones that profit from the current corrupt system. It is, however, a cause that everyone who cares about a qualified and independent judiciary needs to keep fighting.

2 comments:

more needed from the NY Times said...

Why isn't the New York Times doing more? They need to rat out the rats who have abused a crooked election system!!

I agree:

We need to turn up the heat WITHIN New York State- with the legislators in Albany. And with upcoming elections, the rule should be:

'Any incumbent judge got there through a FIXED system- ELECT someone NEW !!!"

Anonymous said...

Why isn't every NEWS MEDIA IN NY STATE jumping all over this insanity. What did you expect from that idiot SCALIA...he haS AN AGENDA AND IT INCLUDES KEEPING CERTAIN GROUPS IN THE JUDICIARY.I beleive the SUPREME COURT SHOULD BE FIRED AND THE MERIT SYSTEM USED TO PUT OTHERS IN POSITION! What a group of appointed judiciary...MOST WHO represent THE MINORITY MAKEUP of how AMERICA thinks....BUSH BOYS AND REGAN FREAKS!
NY STATE WILL NEVER CORRECT THE VERY SYSTEM THEY PUT IN PLACE IN HOPES IT WOULD CORRUPT, WHICH WAS INTENDED TO BE THE MOST FAIR AND SACRED SYSTEM WE AMERICANS ARE COMPELLED TO BE INVOLVED IN THROUGHOUT OUR DAILY LIVES!
HOW OUTRAGEOUS IS IT, THAT THESE STUFFED DRESSES DICTATE WHAT WE AMERICANS WANT AND NEED AND IGNORE THIS BLATANT CORRUPTION...BECAUSE THEY THEY CLAIM THEY CAN'T FIND HOW IT VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTION. IF THE JUDICIARY WANTS TO FIGURE IN THE CONSTITUTION IN DETERMINATIONS..THEY JUST DO IT. THEY EVEN ALLOWED CLARENCE THOMAS ( A PERVERT) TO BE ONE OF THEM...HIS BEHAVIOR ALL AGAINST TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 AND THE 14TH AMENDMENT FOR ANITA HILL!
I AM MORE THAN A DISGUSTED AND DISILLUSIONED AMERICAN! GOD BLESS AMERICA IS NOT A PRAYER, BUT A CALL FOR HELP!!!

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:


               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
         
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2