The New York Daily News - EDITORIAL - October 26, 2009
Surprise, surprise. Pamela Fisher, previously identified here as this year's poster person for sleazy judge-making, is a serial ethics violator to boot. Fisher's sole, uh, qualification for the Civil Court is that she is an old friend and political ally of Brooklyn Democratic boss Vito Lopez. Although licensed as a lawyer, she has had virtually no legal experience. And she cannot claim to respect the laws and regulations that govern the conduct of judicial candidates.
Many are her transgressions:
- Fisher has never filed a personal financial disclosure statement. Court rules say declared candidates for judgeships must reveal personal holdings, assets and liabilities to the public in reports submitted to the court's Ethics Commission. Fisher's statement was due Dec. 30.
- Fisher never filed a campaign finance report with the city Board of Elections. Her campaign committee was required to submit written reports in January and July detailing its fund-raising and spending.
- Fisher has not filed a campaign finance report with the state Board of Elections since July, missing mandated submissions Oct. 2 and another on Friday. Penalties for late filing and noncompliance include fines, court judgments and possible jail time.
- Although she faces no opposition, thanks to maneuvering by Lopez, Fisher's campaign included flyers touting her candidacy jointly with that of Lopez-backed City Council contender Maritza Davila. Would-be judges are strictly prohibited from publicly endorsing or opposing candidates in other races.
10 comments:
Garbage In, Garbage Out. This is the New York State Court system- GARBAGE.
ok, now we need the Daily News to actually run a friggin' story on the Sampson hearings.
I bet inside-plant Daily News reporter Barbara Ross, who is married to Bob Tembeckjian, was consulted before this was published!!
How about the other newspapers- ANY newspapers, for that matter--- they ALL should be covering the court corruption.
to become a judge or get approved they do not need expierience.
For example Civil court the have to be addmited and paying the Barr association for 10 years. They could have spent the whole time working at Burger King. They never had to practice or been to court in 10 years.
Before they run they donate money to certain pollitical candidates.
Then they give money to certain political groups for endorsments.
These groups no one knows who runs these orginiztions or what they do.
But they control who gets on the ballets and who does not. These groups that are usually run by lawyers. Judges know this and when they want to run they know what lawyer to take care of. This way they know next time they run they will need money and endorsments.
We have the best Judges that money con buy! What else needs to be said?
it may not only be the money,
I wonder who she may have slept with or does sleep with...
sometimes that works wonders for your career!
that explains all those high political contributions and the advancement of some in certain years of those high contributions
the paper is not large enough to print the corruption on the NYS Court System, is someone writing the book with sequels?
someone could make a lot of money writing a book!
Post a Comment