MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of May 15, 2014, we've received over 137,835 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email: CorruptCourts@gmail.com

Monday, September 24, 2007

Judicial Steering Continues in Westchester County....(CLICK HERE FOR FULL STORY)

An overhaul of judicial assignments within the Ninth Judicial District in June of 2006 was supposed to have solved the problem concerning allegations of steering cases. It seems, however, that the situation got worse, with more and more troubling revelations nearly every day.....MORE....

Since we'll soon be posting some of the newest findings concerning allegations of judicial steering in the Ninth Judicial District, we provide the following background article by Daniel Wise of The New York Law Journal:

Judicial Steering in New York Courts
New York Law Journal

Westchester's Matrimonial Part Revamped in Wake of Infighting

by Daniel Wise

06-26-2006

After months of bitter infighting, Ninth Judicial District Administrative Judge Francis A. Nicolai (See Profile) has reassigned all four judges who have been hearing divorce cases in Westchester County.

Two of five referees assigned to the matrimonial part are also being given new assignments, and the format for the matrimonial part itself is being revamped, said Office of Court Administration spokesman David Bookstaver.

Three new judges will be transferred into the part starting today, he added.

The judges are being shuffled and the part reorganized, Mr. Bookstaver said, because court officials have learned "from the nature of matrimonial work that it is historically prudent to rotate judges."

When the changes are fully implemented, the matrimonial part, which decides approximately 900 contested divorce cases a year, will have one fewer judge and two fewer referees.

The change in format, which will be phased in, will result in judges handling their own cases from start to finish, Mr. Bookstaver said. For the time being, though, judges assigned to the part will supervise cases until a fact issue is ready to be tried. At that point, cases will be assigned to any judge or referee in the part, or one of two backup judges, to conduct a fact-finding hearing.

Two of the judges being reassigned will continue to conduct fact-finding hearings during the transition, Mr. Bookstaver said. He added that no date had been set for the completion of the change in court procedures.

Westchester Surrogate Anthony A. Scarpino, who is coming into the part as supervising judge, will not carry his own inventory of cases, Mr. Bookstaver said. Surrogate Scarpino (See Profile) replaces Justice W. Denis Donovan (See Profile), who was responsible for assigning cases out to trial and hearings twice a week, and also carried a calendar of post-judgment enforcement motions.

The rotations are related to the controversies that have swirled through the part in recent months. Without being specific, Mr. Bookstaver said that the public has raised "a number of issues about the part's practices and policies and the changes are designed to address those serious issues."

Mr. Bookstaver would not discuss details, and said he could neither confirm nor deny whether investigations had been conducted by OCA Inspector General Sherrill R. Spatz.

But a referee assigned to the part, James A. Montagnino, has made available to the Law Journal a letter he wrote on March 13 to Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye and five other top administrative judges complaining that Justice Nicolai had improperly intervened in cases on seven occasions after having had ex parte contact with a lawyer or litigant.

And in interviews, both Mr. Montagnino and his lawyer, Fred L. Shapiro, a former County Court judge, said they had met with Ms. Spatz, who was conducting an investigation into the charges raised in Mr. Montagnino's letter to Judge Kaye.

Mr. Montagnino separately said that about a week after he wrote his letter, Ms. Spatz informed him that her office would be investigating complaints lodged against him by a number of female litigants whose cases he had handled. Other than Ms. Spatz, no agency has jurisdiction to investigate such charges.

Outcomes of Investigations

With regard to the investigation of Mr. Montagnino, Mr. Shapiro said that on June 5, Mr. Montagnino was told at a meeting with OCA's director of human relations that Ms. Spatz's investigation had resulted "in no negative findings." But he said OCA proposed that Mr. Montagnino accept a transfer to the Bronx because "it would be better for everyone if he did not continue to work in Westchester."

Mr. Montagnino, in turn, asked for a transfer to the Albany area because he could move to his vacation home in Saratoga, Mr. Shapiro said, and it was agreed he would be given an assignment in either Albany or Rensselaer county.

Mr. Bookstaver said that Mr. Montagnino was one of two referees who is being transferred out of the matrimonial part, and that starting today he will be assigned in the Third Judicial District, which includes Rensselaer and Albany counties.

To the extent that no public action has been taken against Justice Nicolai, and he remains as administrative judge for the five-county Ninth Judicial District, it can be inferred that Ms. Spatz found no merit to Mr. Montagnino's complaint.

As for the ex parte issues raised in Mr. Montagnino's March 13 letter, Mr. Bookstaver said that dealing with complaints from litigants and lawyers is "a part of what administrative judges do — it is very much a part of the administrative judge's responsibilities."

Three New Judges

Like Mr. Montagnino, Judicial Hearing Officer Edward P. Borrelli was reassigned as part of the court shakeup. Starting today, Mr. Borrelli will be working in the commercial part of the Westchester courthouse.

The three other referees who had been assigned to handle fact-finding hearings and occasionally whole cases, will now each be paired with one of the new judges handling divorces. In their new roles, they will be sent "narrowly framed issues" to try, and also handle conferences and motions in cases assigned to their judges, Mr. Bookstaver said.

The three referees who will continue to do matrimonial work are Meryl Amster, Irene Ratner and Reynold Snyder, though he is also slated for reassignment. Mr. Bookstaver said that Mr. Snyder will be replaced after he is reassigned.

The four judges being reassigned from the part are Justices Donovan, Bruce E. Tolbert (See Profile), Richard B. Liebowitz (See Profile) and William J. Giacomo (See Profile).

Justices Donovan, Tolbert and Giacomo will carry the same type of caseloads as other generalists receiving civil assignments in Westchester, though Justices Tolbert and Giacomo will remain available to conduct fact-finding hearings in divorce cases during the transition. Justice Liebowitz will also handle a normal civil caseload, but in Rockland County, starting today

In addition to Surrogate Scarpino, the judges coming into the part are Westchester Justice Linda Jamieson (See Profile), a former divorce practitioner and Family Court judge, and Justice Lewis Lubell, a plaintiffs' personal injury attorney who was elected to the bench from Westchester County last November but who has been sitting in Orange County.

Justice Lubell will be replaced in Orange County by Justice Joseph Alessandro (See Profile), who is being brought in from Rockland.

Concern Over Resources

Matrimonial bar leaders in Westchester expressed concern that the changes will leave them with one fewer judge and two fewer referees. They also said they were caught short by the changes.

Neil A. Fredman of Fredman & Kosan, who until May 17 was the head of the family law section of the Westchester County Bar Association, said that he had first heard "rumblings" of the planned changes two weeks ago. Mr. Fredman said that, even though the family law chairman historically has served as the liaison between the Westchester matrimonial bar and matrimonial judges, he had received no communication from the court about the proposed changes.

Mr. Fredman said that he was "mystified" as to why OCA was reassigning the judges. "There were charges and countercharges flying all over the place," he said, and the "only visible result is that all the judges are gone — and the complaints had nothing to do with them."

The bar fought hard to have more referees and a fourth judge added to the part, Mr. Fredman said. Now that they are gone, he added, "we will certainly be pressing to get them back."

Lonya A. Gilbert, a co-chairwoman of the Westchester women bar's matrimonial committee, said, "Our clients are required to come to preliminary conferences, and we already often have to wait a half hour. This certainly won't make the situation any better."

Fallout in Orange County

The dustup in Westchester has also had reverberations in Orange County, where lawyers are upset over the loss of Justice Lubell.

Joseph A. Owen the immediate past president of the Orange County Bar Association, said his association had written to Justice Nicolai asking that Justice Lubell not be reassigned, but was advised in a phone call that the transfer "was already done."

Justice Lubell, who was elected to the Supreme Court last November, was "a real gem," Mr. Owen said. "With his experience as a trial lawyer, he was able to move cases expeditiously and fairly," and both sides of the personal injury bar "appreciated having him on their cases."

Jonathan Jacobson, the Democratic leader in Orange County said he had contacted both Chief Administrative Judge Jonathan Lippman (See Profile) and Justice Nicolai, asking them not to reassign Justice Lubell.

Mr. Jacobson said he had gotten "lots of calls from Democratic and Republican lawyers alike expressing extreme displeasure" at Justice Lubell's transfer. They all felt, he said, that Justice Lubell had not "forgotten that he was a lawyer once, and understands the needs of lawyers."

Complaints to Conduct Panel

The infighting that led to the eventual shakeup in Westchester are reflected in the complaints against Justice Nicolai that Mr. Montagnino made in his March 13 letter and were mirrored in a complaint he filed nearly two weeks later with the state Commission on Judicial Conduct. Both the letter and complaint asserted seven instance of improper ex parte contacts in six cases.

In addition, Barry Skwiersky, court attorney to Justice Giacomo, complained separately to the commission about Justice Nicolai's intervention in two of the cases cited by Mr. Montagnino, which had also been handled by his judge.

Mr. Montagnino's attorney, Mr. Shapiro, who handled matrimonial cases in Westchester for eight years, filed a third complaint with the commission in which he offered added factual support concerning three of the alleged episodes of improper involvement by Justice Nicolai.

In two of those episodes, Mr. Shapiro claimed to be relaying information provided by Mr. Borrelli, who is a member of the court system's Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics. According to Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Borrelli complained about two instances of ex parte intervention by Justice Nicolai in a divorce case that he was handling. Mr. Borrelli declined to comment.

Mr. Shapiro said that, as far as he is aware, his and Mr. Montagnino's complaints are still pending before the commission. Mr. Skwiersky also said he believed his complaint is still pending. Under conduct commission procedures, complainants are advised of how their complaints are disposed.

As for the complaints against Mr. Montagnino that he was biased against women, many matrimonial lawyers sent letters to Ms. Spatz's office attesting that he "was not a sexist," said Mr. Fredman of the Westchester bar. The outpouring of letters — one source said there were upwards of 30 — reflected a strong level of support.

Kathleen Donelli, another co-chairwoman of the Westchester women bar's matrimonial committee, for instance, said Mr. Montagnino is "always fair to women and women's issues and has the utmost respect of both male and female attorneys."

But some lawyers have a more negative view. Carol Most, a lawyer who was cited by Mr. Montagnino in two of his alleged examples of ex parte contacts, publicly criticized him as being "unfair" to women at a meeting of the Westchester women bar's matrimonial committee in 2003, according to Ms. Donelli, a partner at McCarthy Fingar in White Plains.

Ms. Most, who at the time was a co-chairwoman of the committee, declined to comment.

The leadership of the women's bar was so upset that its president at the time, Kathy N. Rosenthal, wrote a letter to Justice Nicolai disavowing Ms. Most's remarks, Ms. Donelli said.

Though the letter did not mention Ms. Most by name, Ms. Rosenthal stated that she was aware that "one or more members" of the association had expressed "an opinion" regarding Mr. Montagnino. She then noted that the association had not given authority to anyone "to speak about or against Referee Montagnino."

Several Westchester matrimonial practitioners identified a small group of lawyers as being highly critical of Mr. Montagnino. None of those lawyers responded to requests to speak about their views, even on a not for attribution basis.

But other lawyers who are aware of their views, described the group as believing that Mr. Montagnino is not favorably disposed to wives with high-end lifestyles who are seeking to maintain those lifestyles, without having to re-enter the work force, through a liberal award of maintenance.

Comments that Mr. Montagnino made during a continuing legal education seminar at Pace law School in 2004 resonated with the critics, some lawyers said.

Referring to the zip code for Scarsdale, 10583, Mr. Montagnino described some women litigants as having outsized and unrealistic expectations of what they can obtain in divorce, a phenomenon he dubbed the "10583 syndrome."

A reading of the full 10-paged, single-spaced transcript of the session, however, reveals other passages that would definitely be helpful to the non-monied spouse.

Tense Episodes

A couple of episodes illustrate the tensions that have marked the conflicts within the court, one involving Mr. Montagnino and one involving Justice Nicolai.

Mr. Montagnino acknowledged in an interview that the day after Ms. Most spoke at the 2003 womens' bar meeting, he bumped into her in the courthouse and asked her to come to his chambers. He said he told Ms. Most, who denied making the remarks attributed to her the night before, that making a false statement that a judicial officer is biased could constitute professional misconduct.

In a similar vein, both Mr. Montagnino and Mr. Shapiro charge that Justice Nicolai contacted court officials in charge of assigning counsel in Family Court cases after a well-respected law guardian complained that Justice Nicolai had intervened on an ex parte basis in a case where she had been assigned to be the law guardian.

According to a source familiar with the situation, the law guardian, Kathleen Hannon, had written "an over-the-top letter" to Justice Nicolai complaining about his ex parte intervention in a divorce case being handled by Mr. Borrelli. (The same case that Mr. Shapiro referred to in his complaint to the conduct commission.)

Justice Nicolai then forwarded Ms. Hannon's letter to the officials who certify lawyers for court appointments in Family Court cases in the Second Department with the notation "for whatever action you deem appropriate."

Ms. Hannon, apologized and that was the end of the matter, the source said. Ms. Hannon did not return a request for comment.

— Daniel Wise can be reached at dwise@alm.com.


13 comments:

running to vote- 4 anyone but Nicolai said...

You too can vote for the corruption to continue in Westchester County!

Yes, on election day the King of the 9th Judicial District (his highness Nicolai) is trying to upgrade his little county court seat for the plush comfort of a supreme court judgeship (it's better for retirement purposes also).

Yup, Nicolai's been the boss over all the fraud and corruption in 5 counties !!!

Wadda ya say. Let's reward the bully who thrust law and order down the toilet and ruined so many lives.

Write in a vote for your dog, the devil, even a circus clown. Vote for ANYONE but nicolai.

Anonymous said...

while it's not necessary to focus on one person, yes judge nicolai is in charge. and, yes, a change is needed.

an attorney said...

David Bookstaver is a cover-up clown & apologist for Kaye et al.

watching the control of the courts said...

I was reading www.disgustedwiththesystem.blogspot.com and came upon this:

For those readers who are old enough to remember the Spencer Tracey movie "Judgment at Nuremburg" you will remember that you were told within the movie that the first thing Adolph Hitler did when he was elected Chancellor was to take control of the Courts. With control of the courts, it didn't matter what laws the Parliament passed, the judges would interpret the laws and rule the way Chancellor Hitler wanted. Death to all those who opposed him.

Boy, this sounds like the NY Courts.

Anonymous said...

the people still don't pick these jerks

Anonymous said...

Leave us alone. This is how we protect our friends in Westchester, we control the courts. If you don't like it, take us to court !!

Anonymous said...

all of this is disgraceful. they belong in jail.

Anonymous said...

If you think White Plains is a mess, you should see what they are doing in New Rochelle and its not about money, just plain old fashioned favoritism. No one is monitoring the magistrates!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

throw them all in jail!

Corrupt Orange County said...

From the recordonline.com


Orange County candidates seek 9th Judicial District seats
By Oliver Mackson
Times Herald-Record
October 29, 2007
Goshen — Orange County voters have the power to end an 8-year drought for local state Supreme Court candidates in next week's election.

Two local candidates are among the six major-party nominees running in the 9th Judicial District, which includes Orange, Rockland, Dutchess, Putnam and Westchester counties. There are three seats up for grabs in an at-large election. Each seat carries a $136,700 annual salary and a 14-year term.

Supreme Court justices, unlike their County and Family court counterparts, must run on an at-large basis in all five counties. They're the only judges in New York who can divide property in a divorce. They also preside over slip-and-fall damage cases and decide disputes between governments, such as Orange County's challenge to the Village of Kiryas Joel's proposed water pipeline.

Orange has lost ground to other counties in the at-large elections for state Supreme Court over the past five years. Justice John McGuirk, who was elected in 1999, is the only locally elected justice serving a full term in Goshen these days. The shortage is filled by judges from other counties in the district, sometimes leading to complaints about judges' lack of familiarity with Orange County, and complaints about cases being postponed when judges return to their home counties.

The candidates tend to put the greatest emphasis on their credentials and experience, rather than staking out policy positions. New York, like other states with judicial elections, places severe restrictions on a candidate's speech. For example, candidates can't promise to rule a particular way in a particular case, lest they be accused of prejudging the case.


Candidates for the 9th Judicial District
• Elaine Z. Slobod, Tuxedo

Democrat-Independence-Conservative-Working Families

Orange County Surrogate and acting state Supreme Court justice. She's been the county's surrogate since 1995, presiding over wills and trusts and carrying a part-time Supreme Court calendar as well. She's also been a Family Court judge and a Middletown City Court judge.

• Christine Krahulik, Warwick

Republican

Orange and Westchester County Family Court support magistrate. She's been a support magistrate since June, a quasi-judicial position that involves resolving child-support issues. From 2000 until her appointment to the support position this year, she was law clerk to Orange County Family Court Judge Carol Klein.

• William J. Sherwood, Stony Point

Republican-Conservative-Independence-Right-to-Life

State Supreme Court justice. Sherwood is seeking his second term on the state Supreme Court. He sits in Rockland County, but he's also served as an acting Supreme Court justice in Orange County.

• Robert Berliner

Democrat-Working Families

Rockland County Surrogate. Like Slobod, Berliner is also an acting state Supreme Court justice. He spent 21 years as a court attorney in state Supreme and Surrogate courts in Rockland, and served in the county Legislature.

• Rory Bellantoni

Republican-Conservative-Independence-Working Families

Westchester County Court judge, presides over one of Westchester County's criminal courts, as well as its sex offender court. He's an acting state Supreme Court justice, and has been an acting Family Court judge.

• Francis Nicolai

Democrat

Westchester County Court judge, served one term as a state Supreme Court justice, then won a County Court seat after Republicans refused to cross-endorse him. Since 1998, Nicolai's been the administrative judge of the 9th Judicial District, which gives him some supervisory duties over other judges.

• Anthony J. DeCintio, Anthony D. Zepf

Right-to-Life

Decinto, a lawyer from Tuckahoe; and Zepf, a lawyer from New City, are also running.

Anonymous said...

James A. Montagnino, James Montagnino should not servein an judicial or other legalcoapacity where he has the abiltiy to stter or maniplulate cases. This man IS NOT a hero to men by making his idiotic statements about scarsdale women. He is a piece of dirt who screwed me and my young children during his reign in Westchester. He was smug, arrogant and his manipulations and sleezy manuevering has led to years of emotional and physical abuse of my children. I am a father and this piece of dirt, Montagnino and the lawyers and law guardians who worked in the shadows with him will be brought to justice. I vowed that everday he hurt my children I would spend twice that amount of time bringing him and the other scum that he left behind in White Plains to justice. I will never forget what he did and I will spread his words via trascripts to every agency in ny and federally.

Anonymous said...

Hon. Bruce E. Tolbert and Anne Gillece (Law Guardian) run a racketeering scheme in Westchester Family Court...read all about it at www.westchesterguardian.com comments.

Anonymous said...

Very Interesting!
Thank You!

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:


               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
         
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2