Branstad says grounds for impeachment not there
The Associated Press - January 4, 2011
URBANDALE, Iowa - Republican Gov.-elect Terry Branstad said he believes that retention votes -- such as the one in November in which voters ousted three state Supreme Court justices -- and not impeachment proceedings are the best way to decide whether the court's other four justices should keep their jobs. Branstad told The Gazette on Monday that he disagrees with the court's unanimous 2009 ruling legalizing gay marriage in the state, but that he doesn't believe it rises to the level of malfeasance prescribed in the Iowa Constitution that would warrant the state House to consider impeachment. Branstad, who will be sworn in for a fifth term as governor later this month, said he believes the court overreached when it struck down the Defense of Marriage Act he signed in 1998 that defined marriage as between a man and a woman. Gay marriage opponents argue that the seven justices legislated from the bench by allowing gay marriage, overstepping their constitutional authority to such an extent that warrants impeachment proceedings. "There's a difference between malfeasance and overreaching, I think. I really think that if people look at the Constitution, I think the remedy is that when they come up for retention that people have a chance to vote them out. I think that's the appropriate remedy. I don't think that impeachment is the appropriate remedy," Branstad said. The incoming governor said he disagrees with House Republicans who have indicated they are drafting articles of impeachment against Justices Brent Appel, Mark Cady, Daryl Hecht and David Wiggins. Three other justices -- Chief Justice Marsha Ternus and Justices David Baker and Michael Streit -- ended their terms on Dec. 31 after losing retention votes in the November election. Branstad also told the paper that he doesn't think Iowa can afford the new two-year contracts that outgoing Gov. Chet Culver negotiated with three employee unions that would provide for a series of across-the-board salary increases. But Branstad said he would oppose treating unionized employees differently by giving them a pay increase that would not be extended to all state workers. He said that would make union employees a "privileged class" and saddle taxpayers with a cost not warranted under current budget restraints. While lawmakers and previous governors have decided to treat employees differently by not extending all the raises included in the collective bargaining to all non-contract state workers, Branstad said he disagrees with that practice. "I'm saying that's wrong and we are going to correct that," he said. Budget officials have estimated that extending the new pacts to all state workers would cost more than $103 million in fiscal 2012. Branstad wants to reopen contract talks with an eye on freezing state employee wages and changing some benefits and compensation provisions. Without bargaining units agreeing the reopen talks once Branstad takes office, he said it appears that cutting the number of state workers to offset the pay increase might be his only option.
MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"
End Corruption in the Courts!
Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email: CorruptCourts@gmail.com
Most Read Stories
- Tembeckjian's Corrupt Judicial 'Ethics' Commission Out of Control
- As NY Judges' Pay Fiasco Grows, Judicial 'Ethics' Chief Enjoys Public-Paid Perks
- New York Judges Disgraced Again
- Wall Street Journal: When our Trusted Officials Lie
- Massive Attorney Conflict in Madoff Scam
- FBI Probes Threats on Federal Witnesses in New York Ethics Scandal
- Federal Judge: "But you destroyed the faith of the people in their government."
- Attorney Gives New Meaning to Oral Argument
- Wannabe Judge Attorney Writes About Ethical Dilemmas SHE Failed to Report
- 3 Judges Covered Crony's 9/11 Donation Fraud
- Former NY State Chief Court Clerk Sues Judges in Federal Court
- Concealing the Truth at the Attorney Ethics Committee
- NY Ethics Scandal Tied to International Espionage Scheme
- Westchester Surrogate's Court's Dastardly Deeds
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
New Governor Wimps Out in Push to Oust Lousy Judges
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(349)
-
▼
January
(42)
- Retiring Nicely After Betraying Public’s Trust
- Corrupt Judge Francis Nicolai in the News Again
- New York Bar Seeks Limits on Investigations of Judges
- $120 Million Federal Lawsuit Says 2 Top NYC Law Fi...
- Local Prosecutor, Battling Cancer and Corruption P...
- Proposal to Revamp New York Judicial-Conduct Agenc...
- Disbarred NY Lawyer Ordered to Pay $3 Million
- Truly a Gem of An Officer of the Court
- Conflicts and Under-Reporting Alleged at U.S. Supr...
- Mayor Slams NYC Judge
- State Bar Annual Meeting Kicks Off Today
- Governor's Ex-Attorney General Staffer to Lead Eth...
- New York 'Sex-tortion' Lawyer Sued in Federal Court
- Feds Create New Oversight Unit
- Disbarred Attorney Requested Readmission To Practi...
- Informal Poll Shows Frustration Over New York Judi...
- NY Lawyers Fear New Tax Copied From Holland
- Federal Judge Stands Firm in Lying Cop's Torture Case
- Former Assistant County Attorney Arrested for Eave...
- NY Attorney Pleads Guilty in Manhattan Federal Cou...
- New York Judges' Lawsuit Seeks $780 Million in Bac...
- Criminal Court Expected to Embrace Racist Plea in ...
- Judge Who Follows Law Annoys Bar Members
- 'Shredder' Lawyer Released to House Arrest
- Judge Remembered as Fair-Minded
- Slow Disbarment for Sexually Conflicted Attorney W...
- A Lovely Attorney, Notwithstanding Being Arrested ...
- Lawyer, Two of HIs Former Firms Sued for $10 Milli...
- Judge Throws Out 5.6 Million Verdict
- Say it Louder, Judge, "Without Integrity, We Lose ...
- Ghosts of Make Believe 2nd Circuit Ethics Oversigh...
- Federal Judge Rules NY Legal Corruption is No Long...
- Chaos Continues in Corrupt New York Appellate Court
- National Need To Clean-Up Local Junk Justice
- Judicial Picking Process From Bad to Worse
- New Governor Wimps Out in Push to Oust Lousy Judges
- Appellate Court OKs Sanctions Against Husband-Wife...
- Corrupt "Ethics" Boss Tembeckjian Continues Biased...
- Governor Cuomo Invited To Show No One Is Above The...
- NC Lawyer and NY College Dean Get Screwed
- Judge, Developer, Banker Involved In Legal Mess, T...
- Judge Sees Corruption FIght As His Legacy
-
▼
January
(42)
See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
3 comments:
I wonder how the new New York governor Andrew Cuomo is going to stand up to the corrupt judges. It'll be interesting....
Lovely, another governor who won't, or can't, stand up to the widespread corruption in this county.
You kiss the judges' [] and expect the judges to repay you in court. Don't kiss and get slapped. How Cuomo will act? The "son of Mario" is seeking another Judith Kaye to appoint as Chief Judge.
Post a Comment