MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email:

Friday, August 15, 2008

Federal Order on New York Court Corruption

To see the August 8, 2008 dated federal court order of the Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin, CLICK HERE.... MORE COMING SOON.....


Anonymous said...

This sister ran scared..shows me OCA is guilty and she knows a bit of the judicial terrorism somewhere in her recent life!
Looks like we are getting closer to exposing the truth, because the hack judges everywhere, are running for high ground!
I think this speaks volumes and we should keep on will happen to them sooner, than later!

Anonymous said...

I read this thing...Did Shira really write this...It appears it was written by some clerk, it is very poor. This was a mass execution. Now the question is why and who and what got to Shira?

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Since when do these dopes pay attention to the constitution?? Only when it can help them. They take children away from Fathers with absolutely no constitutional grounds all the time....I am going to open a store and sell pitchforks and torches! anyone interested??

Anonymous said...

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO Act or RICO) is a United States federal law that provides for extended penalties for criminal acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. It also provides a civil cause of action for those injured by violations of the act. RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted 1970-10-15). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961–1968. It was intended to make it easier to prosecute organized crime figures, but has been applied in several other cases as well.

Anonymous said...

You have to find a judge who has a case that reflects these allegations and it has to be brought to his we can then see if the federal court will police the state courts.. specifically....THE ENTIRE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION!
The federal court does have such a case pending in front of them now...let's see!

Anonymous said...

what about that case around 2004 and 2005 which brought RICO style allegations against State Supreme Court Judge Marilyn Diamond and the Federal Judge in the Southern District of NY Ordered Settlement talks? I believe some of the claims related to improprieties thru the Surrogate Court. Brad Hamilton of the NY Post did a story on this when the Settlements were ordered. Anyone know what happened after? Word was out there that the feds and FBI were looking at systematic corruption in the Courts back then. Anyone have the complaint filed in that case?

POST Found at Website TruthDig:

By Shanan, October 15, 2007 at 6:38 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Open letter

Connecting the dots. Are these the kind of people we will have in government? with you?

Dear Mr. Giuliani,

Running for office? Please, read the following, you will be asked about it.
Your strong support for the judge mentioned herein, and in return, her and her family’s (monetary and otherwise) support of you raise serious safety, security, judicial and ethical questions. When you don’t do anything about this “judge”, in order to protect all people including children, what kind of safety, security, law and justice are we all pursuing?
Friends, concerned citizens including myself, will generate this letter throughout our great country.

Judge Eyed in Court-Transcript Probe
By Brad Hamilton, New York Post, May 7, 2006
The state court watchdog is investigating charges that Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Marilyn Diamond changed official transcripts, allegedly to help cover up favorable rulings she made for pals, The Post has learned. The Commission on Judicial Conduct interviewed court reporter Maurice Schwartzberg two weeks ago - and he admitted making “substantial revisions” to transcripts at the judge’s request in one case.

Judge’s $$ Offer in ‘Ripoff’
By Brad Hamilton, New York Post, October 31, 2004
Embattled Manhattan Supreme Court judge Marylin Diamond has made a multimillion-dollar settlement offer to an Israeli research center that claims she and her ex-law partner ripped off millions it stood to inherit, sources close to the deal said. Diamond made the offer last week even as she and ex-partner Janet Neschis were battling to get the center’s 3-year-old lawsuit tossed out of Manhattan federal court. The renowned Weizmann Institute of Science claims in court papers that it was due to inherit about $8 million from wealthy art collector Natasha Gelman upon her death in 1998. But the institute claims it lost out after Diamond and Neschis got their hands on the elderly woman’s vast fortune.

Greg B. Smith and Bob Port, New York Daily News, February 10, 2004

Justice Marylin Diamond appointed her former law partner and close friend to handle a sick man’s legal affairs. That same friend oversaw a trust that later awarded Diamond $1.1 million. She hired an engineer who was a witness in a case she heard to work on her apartment building, not disclosing her actions until after she had ruled in favor of the party that had called the engineer. And 19 times since 2000, she has heard civil cases while she or her husband owned stock in one party - without disclosing her financial ties to the opposing side. Diamond refused repeated requests from the Daily News for an interview and did not respond to written questions.

F.B.I. Investigates Judge’s Decisions for Defendant, Officials Say
By William K. Rashbaum, New York Times, March 29, 2003
The F.B.I. is investigating accusations that an acting State Supreme Court justice, in several civil cases in Manhattan, favored a defendant represented by the law firm where the judge’s husband works, law enforcement officials said yesterday…The investigation has focused on the role of the judge, Marylin G. Diamond.

Jewess Judge Diamond Writes Anti-Semitic Threats To Herself the Judge’s Mysterious Letters
By Michele Mcphee, New York Daily News, Daily News Police Bureau Chief, Saturday, September 14th, 2002.

Anonymous said...

Judge Slapped in Art 'Scam'
By Brad Hamilton New York Post December 25, 2005 - A federal judge — citing 24 alleged illegal acts — has ordered embattled Manhattan jurist Marylin Diamond and two associates to enter settlement talks with a family that claims the trio stole hundreds of millions from an elderly art heiress. The judge ruled the heiress' surviving relatives showed enough proof of two dozen fraudulent acts by Diamond's co-trustee of the family trust, Janet Neschis, and another associate to allow their racketeering lawsuit to go forward.

Anonymous said...

Even though the CJC supposedly finally started an investigation about Diamond in later years, this article summarized below seems to be Standard Improper Practice at the CJC and DDCs where all too often folks who petition for redress and complain are not even contacted before their petitions are dismissed. Is this part of a practice, policy, custom? maybe Stern should be on the Deposition list for Anderson?

Cases vs. Diamond Dismissed
By Michele Mcphee Daily News Police Bureau Chief April 3, 2003 - The Commission on Judicial Conduct has dismissed more than a dozen complaints against Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Marylin Diamond, even as the FBI opened a case into whether she engaged in potential conflicts of interest from the bench. The commission, which is run by Gerald Stern, dismissed all of the complaints without contacting the people who wrote his agency letters. Instead, Stern's agency sent a form letter that read in part, "There was 'insufficient indication of judicial misconduct.'" Yesterday, Stern refused to comment. "I cannot discuss complaints as a matter of law," he said

Anonymous said...

Maybe Brad Hamilton knows a bit about where the Fed investigations in the State Court ended up? He did a story on an upstate Judge with connections to Pataki and Bruno and then no one could hardly get Brad on the phone again and his superiors were killing any further stories. Too bad as Brad seemed like a nice guy too.

FBI'S 'Bench' Press
By Brad Hamilton New York Post January 11, 2004 - EXCLUSIVE - The FBI is probing powerful Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Marylin Diamond and two colleagues on the bench - Justices Shirley Kornreich and Judith Gische - for allegedly doling out judicial favors to friends and associates, sources close to the case said.

Feds Eye 'Conflict' Lawyer
By Brad Hamilton New York Post November 13, 2003 - A high-powered divorce attorney is being investigated by the FBI and the state-court inspector general for alleged influence peddling after he gave campaign money to embattled Judge Marylin Diamond and hired her law clerk while arguing a case before her, The Post has learned.

Anonymous said...

The one present method of entering the courts' corruption activities, is the remaining employment lawsuits against them!

These cases HAVE to be made public, because they are against a taxpayer government entity, and the law assures that the taxpayer be made aware, that these case have been settled or litigated through a trial!

Thus..all the tampered with paperwork can be given to the press, along with the proof of office and home terrorism and any additional information that implicates OCA in an organized crime scam to hush the allegations, by additional judges, administrators and employees!

No working American wants to hear that someone who has worked for many years for their employer has been fired, because they were forced to file a discriminatin action due to constant and continuous actions of harassment and terrorism etc, by OCA employees and supervisors, and where it has interfered with their taxpayer designated duties. This behavior went on daily and for many years, only to have the allegations covered up, by all the administrators, the entire time!

Add to that, the fact that OCA settled a previous case of discrimination a few years before, with the same individual and these present charges and subsequent firing, were in retaliation for filing that case...which by the way had a judge removed for sexual harassment!

So, OCA has some explaining to do, because their are so many provable allegations of illegal behavior!

Anonymous said...

You see, in NY, and not too long ago, only the state courts were cesspools, the federal courts were clean as can be. But then the smell, stench and excrement made its way to the federal courts in New York. The party bosses realized it was necessary to also control the federal courts. And they have succeeded in polluting what was once a true system of law and order. In New York, anyway, the federal courts are getting worse every day, though they have ways to go to get to the depths of the state court toilets.

Anonymous said...

when Michael Garcia became the US Attorney for the SDNY all of the existing prior investigations of NYS Judges stopped. The coverup began, Michael Garcia was a clerk for none other than the dishonorable Judge Judith Kaye. It was a contact as they say. And Michael Garcia will be history in February 2009 when we have a new Democrat President, just maybe there is hope.

Anonymous said...

Judge Shira A. Scheindlin I understand considers herself a religious person. Is this this act of such a person?

Anonymous said...

LOOK at the bigger problems
Johnathan Lippman. I think Lippmann appointed Shira Sheindlin.
I could not find that out for certain.
He also appointed the judge that rulled in favor for judicial pay raises, Edward Lehner.
Also Marilyn Diamond was also appointed by Johnathan Lippman.
Marilyn Diamond and her husband a former judge were accused of making decisions bassed in religion.
Jaqueline Silbermann was appointed by Lippman
Judges that get appointed you can not find out to who they have made campaign donations to. Were they appointed because of thier campaign donations or party affiliation?
Were they appointed because of thier religious beliefs?

It is clear that Lipmman should be removed. If appointments must be made they should be made by a diverse pannel. Judge Marilyn Diamond alone with all of the charges made against her leaves no dought that the judicial appointments are fixed.
It is amazing that Marlily Diamond is still on the bench.

Anonymous said...

I am not familiar with Federal Procedure.. so perhaps someone can answer the following questions..

Is it true that "Good Faith" and immunity go hand in hand???

Was an Evidentiary Hearing.. necessary to establish the presumption of "good faith" pertaining to the actors or vice a versa.. "bad faith"?

Anonymous said...

and one more...
and yet another question..

Can Rule 201.. (Judicial Notice , mandatory in some instances, be used to submit into evidence much of what has been complained about on this board..

ie possibly even the closed cases vs. the later FBI investigations... (official government reports)...

The benefit..

more difficult to "wash"... if a judge were so inclined... ???

Anonymous said...

so basically this federal bitxh screwed everyone! Have I got it right? Duh, what did you expect, she is a lawyer, that all protect one an other, what part of that don't you understand?

Anonymous said...

So far, some of the Plaintiff's filed Motion's for Reconsideration and within two days recieved an Order of DENIAL...Who the f--- wrote that Order, it's completely incorrect... Somebody in that Federal Court is smoking crack..Where is Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, is she behind these dismissal's and denial's?

Anonymous said...

I don't know if I would have put all causes in one basket...

Though much was exposed...

The basket approach dismissed the causes without distinction..


for study...

*When all possibilities seem to be exhausted... there is another way..

Anonymous said...

To the above anonymous writer, and the other way would be?

Anonymous said...

To the above...

I will post more later... some work needs to be done first...

I do have a question ... not related to the above...

How exactly were all the Plaintiff's combined and then dismissed???

Was there an order combining them? Is it posted anywhere???

Wilbert Moore said...

Mr. Wilbert Moore
September 4, 2008

Re: Complaint against the Southern District of New York's United States Attorneys
Michael J. Garcia,

Office of the Inspector General / US Department of Justice
Investigation Division / Room 4706
950 Pennsylviana Ave. N.W.
Washington, DC, 20530

I'm alleging the following; the Southern District of New York's US Attorney Michael J. Garcia, and his alleged co-conspirators Andrez Carberry, Alecia Walters, and Alexandra
Standish, are allegedly involved in an ongoing conspiracy that was started approximately six years ago when the NYC's Department of Education's (DOE) conspirators falsely accused me of felonious child abuse and allegedly fired me from my position as an Instructor of Technology Education. US Attorney Garcia is the Southern District of New York's (SDNY) United States Attorney; his office is located at One Saint Andrews Plaza, NYC 10007. Attorneys Andrez Carberry, Alecia Walters, and Alexandra Standish, work for the NYC Law Department, which is
located at 100 Church St. New York City 10007.

2. This alleged conspiracy started over six years ago when the DOE's conspirators allegedly falsely accused me of felonious child abuse and illegally fired me from my position as a DOE Instructor of Technology Education. I went through all of the steps of the United Federation of Teachers so-called due process procedure, which ended when I won my Arbitration on February 23, 2004 (See "Exhibits 7, 8, and 9"). However, the fact that I won my Arbitration allegedly meant nothing to the SDNY's Judge Loretta Preska who allegedly ignored the USC's Title 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act" when she refused to certify the "Arbitrator's Uncontested Award" and dismissed my case. Judge Preska ruled in favor of my opponents even after I informed her of the fact that I had won my arbitration several weeks before she issued her order to dismiss my case.

3. I'm requesting that you investigate the alleged conspiratorial misconduct of US
Attorney Michael Garcia and his alleged co-conspirators Attorneys Carberry, Walters, and Standish for the following reasons: according to "Barron's Law Dictionary" the term "Conspirator" is defined as, and I quote:

"CONSPIRATOR one involved in a conspiracy; one who acts with another, or others, in furtherance of an unlawful transaction. It is not necessary that all of the
conspirators either meet together or agree simultaneously It is not necessary that each member of a conspiracy know the exact part which every other participant is
playing; nor is it necessary in order to be bound by the acts of his associates that each member of the conspiracy shall know all the other participants therein; nor is
it requisite that simultaneous action be had for those who come on later, and cooperate in the common effort to obtain the unlawful results, to become parties thereto and assume responsibility for all that has been done before. 47 F. Supp.
395, 400-01." End quote. According to the above-mentioned "Barron's Law Dictionary" definition of a
conspirator, I'm assuming that US Attorney Garcia and his co-conspirators Attorney Carberry,
Attorney Walters, and Attorney Standish are alleged co-conspirators until your investigation
proves otherwise because; US Attorney Garcia has not answered the numerous Interrogatories
I sent him that would prove the existence of his anonymous co-defendants known only as
"Students A, B, C, and D," and the "Conspirators" (See Exhibit 1).

4. I've enclosed as "Exhibit 10" a copy of the affidavit that was signed by Attorney Standish, which states that she does not know the names and or the addresses of the clients she was allegedly representing. I'm alleging that Attorney Standish fraudulently induced the SDNY's Clerks and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Clerks into conspiring to commit
"Fraud Upon the Court." The Clerks and the Conspirators were not simply abusing their
discretional duty; they allegedly conspired to commit several felonies. I'm filing this instant
complaint pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures (FRCP) Rule 8(e)(2), in order to exercise my Constitutional Rights by reporting the alleged commission of Federal Crimes to Federal Judges and your Office.

5. I'm alleging that Conspiratorial Fraud was committed when someone at the 2nd Circuit
Court of Appeals removed information from my Official Public Docket Tracking Sheets, which subsequently caused the closing of my case. A casual side-by-side examination of "Exhibits 2, 3, and 4" will illustrate my reason for requesting an investigation because; what has allegedly been removed from "Exhibit 2" are the two Court Ordered entries dated January 5, 2006 (See "Exhibits 2 and 3"). The deleted Court Orders included my request for a "Summary Judgment" that would have proven the non-existence of the Defendants anonymous Students.
I'm alleging that the Courts Orders were illegally removed in violation of the USC's Title 18
§1506, Title 18 §1509, and Title 18 §242. After the removal of the January 5, 2006, and January 11, 2006, Court Orders, my case was closed.

6. I'm also alleging that pursuant to the FRAP's Rule 25(a) Section 4, the Court dismissed my appeal without considering the pending motions I had before the Court via the above-mentioned January 5, 2006, and the January 11, 2006, Court Orders (See "Exhibits 2, 3, and 4"). I'm alleging that a conspiracy still exist to conceal the fact that the DOE's anonymous co-defendants known as "Students A, B, C, and D," do not exist. I've filed several Motions in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals asking them to compel discovery because none of the 3 Interrogatories I sent to Attorney Garcia were officially answered (See "Exhibit 1").

7. I'm alleging that "Exhibits 2, 3, and 4" are documented proof that Federal Court documents were allegedly illegally altered under the "Color of Law" to my detriment, which
caused the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to rule against me and close the cases I had before
them under Docket Numbers 04-3555-cv and 05-5249-cv. Pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, and the FRCP's Rule 8(e)(2) I have the Constitutional right to report to a Federal Judge the allegation that the Federal Crime of "Fraud Upon the Court" was committed. It is my understanding that pursuant to the United State's Code Titles 18 §1506, Title 18's §1509, and
Title 18's §242, altering Court documents for the purpose of removing and or ignoring a "Court
Order" is a felony.

8. Regarding the unanswered Interrogatories I sent to US Attorney Garcia; I've enclosed
as "Exhibit 11" a copy of Judge Pooler's June 18, 2008, Order in which she stated that, and I
quote: "IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that appellant's motion for an order compelling discovery in the
District Court for the Southern District of New York is DENIED." End quote. Judge Pooler is correct in denying my motion to compel discovery in the SDNY because: I made a mistake when I also requested compulsion of discovery in the SDNY's District Court as well as the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
The complaint I filed in Judge Hellerstein's District Court under Docket Number 08 Civ. 532(AKH) was
dismissed "Sua sponte" on or around March 5, 2008. However, it is my understanding that pursuant to the FRCP's Rule 37(a)(1), any open Court can compel discovery, therefore my request to compel
discovery is still valid because I have a pending appeal in the Second Circuit under Docket
Number 08-1874-Cv (See "Exhibit 6").

9. Please find enclosed; as "Exhibit 1" a copy of the Second Circuit Court of Appeal's
unanswered June 23, 2008, "Interrogatory I sent to: US Attorney General Mike McKasey, US
Attorney Michael Garcia, Second Circuit Court of Appeals Clerk Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe,
the SDNY's Clerk Michael McMahon, the NYC's Law Department's Attorney Andrez
Carberry, and the NYC Department of Education's Legal Department Attorney Judy Nathan. I've enclosed as "Exhibit 5" a copy of the letter I received from the Justice Department, and as "Exhibit 12" a copy of "Page 3" of the "Clerk's Public Docket Tracking Sheet" to show that US Attorney Garcia is the Attorney of Record of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals case number 08-1874-cv.

Conclusion: for the above-mentioned reasons, since the SDNY's US Attorney Michael
Garcia has not responded to my complaint or any of my motions or Interrogatories, and since
there is no proof that Students A, B, C, and D, ever existed, I'm requesting that your Office
conduct an investigation into the alleged conspiratorial felonious misconduct of US Attorney
Garcia. Respectfully submitted,

Affirmation of Verification

State of New York County of New York
I, Wilbert Moore/Plaintiff Pro Se swear and state that I'm the Pro Se/Plaintiff in this proceeding; that I have read the above information and I know the content thereof; and that same is true to my knowledge except as to matters therein stated to be alleged upon
information and belief, and as to those matter, I believe that they are true.

Wilbert Moore

USPO Receipt for certified mail number:7006 0100 0005 7200 1940

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:

               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2
Add to Technorati Favorites