Expose Corrupt Courts

MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email: CorruptCourts@gmail.com

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

New York Could Learn From New Hampshire

Public Censure With Mandatory Diversion Summary
The New Hampshire Supreme Court Attorney Discipline Office  -  August 25, 2008

The New Hampshire Supreme Court Professional Conduct Committee deliberated the matter of Boehm, Lenora E. ad vs. Robin Marble #07-018, and issued a Public Censure with Mandatory Diversion on July 21, 2008.


 Ms. Boehm was retained by Robin Marble on or about August 22, 2006, to represent her in a divorce. Ms. Marble paid Ms. Boehm a $3,000 retainer on or about August 22, 2006. Ms. Boehm filed an appearance on or about September 7, 2006. Ms. Marble met with Ms. Boehm on October 23, 2006. Following that meeting, Ms. Marble made numerous phone calls to Ms. Boehm. Ms. Boehm did not return any of Ms. Marble’s telephone calls, or otherwise communicate directly with Ms. Marble. Ms. Boehm did not respond to Ms. Marble’s emails in January, 2007 through April, 2007. Ms. Boehm did not respond to Ms. Marble’s request for a full refund of her retainer, to her request for a refund of the balance of funds, or to a request for an itemized bill for legal services. On or about March 14, 2007, Ms. Marble retained subsequent counsel. Subsequent counsel filed an appearance on March 26, 2007. Ms. Boehm filed her withdrawal on or about the same time.

The Committee determined that the following findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record, and accepts the Stipulation as to the facts that:


· Ms. Boehm negligently violated her obligations to communicate properly with her client.

· Ms. Boehm’s negligence caused her client to suffer needless anxiety.


The Committee found that there was clear and convincing evidence, and accepts the Stipulation as to the Rule violations that Lenora E. Boehm violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.4; 8.1(b), and 8.4(a).


Ms. Boehm was issued a Public Censure with Mandatory Diversion, and assessed all costs associated with the investigation and prosecution of this matter. The mandatory diversion component of the sanction requires Ms. Boehm to undergo an office management audit and comply with all recommendations of the auditor.


 This matter is public record, and available for inspection at the New Hampshire Supreme Court Attorney Discipline Office, 4 Chenell Drive, Suite 102, Concord, New Hampshire 03301.


 August 25, 2008
Posted by Corrupt Courts Administrator at 5:19 AM

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The corrupt justice system has also screwed the lawyers don't forget. So much time is wasted that it's hard to get everything done so you fall behind. Everyone loses with a corrupt system of justice.

May 9, 2012 at 6:23 AM
Anonymous said...

I made a similar complaint in NY, where the attorney refused to return the retainer in addition to not return calls or making any communications and the Grievance Committee wrote back that this was acceptable to them, even though the attorney did no work after receiving the retainer. NY will learn only when the media reports.

May 9, 2012 at 10:22 AM
Anonymous said...

ok reporting about my suffolk county ny divorce. Filed in 2000. Hon. Judge William Kent. Suffolk Supreme Court Central Islip.
First attorney recommended by Tom Spota before he became dist. atty. Jim O'Rourke from Spota's law practice. Opposing attorney was William H.Sweeney Hauppauge NY.
at that time. I had no clue that my husband was descretely involved with the entire county in financial crimes.
I lost everything was verbally abused to the point of tears by the Honorable Judge Kent numerous times.
Later on I found out about the fraud on my own.When I bought a home by myself in 2002. I found my exs handwriting on my deed & mortgage papers. All of them. Aprox 10 of them. He signed my name. I signed none.
Began to cross ref. the judges attorneys etc. That I went before. All of them had many sub prime mortgages. All had satisfactions that coincided with my court dates. It was then that I discovered the judges were allowing my ex Mike Figat. To answer and file all of my court filings. His handwriting on Family Coirt Orders, Deeds, mortgages, Signed for Judge Kent,McNulty, Rodriguez, Molia,Wilmott. Same with the lawyers, cops.
Somebody get me in contact with 60 minutes. I know the whole truth.Documents too.

May 9, 2012 at 12:26 PM
Sabrina hope said...

This headline that NY could learn from NH is sick, you may want to wake up and smeel the stink you are all eating if you entertain such hypocrisy. The judiciary in nh is controled by the executive agenda to build the worst kind of collusion and liars possible,you want some representation, dont pusy foot around get the facts,or get the hell of the internet and stick to drinking your koolaid 603-965-4067 things are not how they appear in good ol NH

December 13, 2013 at 9:36 PM
Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Long Island lawyer helps judge swap one wife for another
On April 15, 2014, attorney Curtis R. Exum, Esq., from Hauppauge, appeared in NYS Supreme Court in Central Islip, NY, to ask Judge William J. Kent III, to remove the wife of former Huntington Town Council Member, Stuart P. Besen, from her home located at 77 Stoothoff Road, in East Northport, NY

Exum told the Court that he was the duly appointed receiver in the Besen v. Besen action, under Index No: 31199/2011.

Exum told the Court that Margaret Besen "must be removed from the marital residence" before he could list and sell the property.

The home in question was listed, on multiple, with Lighthouse Realty Group, Inc., in Selden, NY when Exum made his request.

A witness to the days proceeding said, "Margaret Besen appeared in Court to answer Exum's motion."

The witness said, "Margaret told Judge Kent that Exum failed to file his required oath."

The witness said, "Margaret told Judge Kent that she didn't understand why Exum had to remove her from her home, or why the realtors had to be changed to sell her property."

The witness said, "Judge Kent made the motion returnable on April 29, 2014 and told Margaret you can show
up, or not, you can answer, or not."

On Friday the 18th of April, Margaret met with attorney Arthur v. Graseck, Esq., from Oakdale, NY, at the Cohalan Courthouse in Central Islip, NY

Graseck checked the papers filed by Exum, as well as the clerk's minutes of the case file.
A copy of Exum's duly executed receiver's oath could not be found.

Margaret told Graseck that Exum has since made Lighthouse Realty remove their listing by saying that the Judge ordered it removed.

Graseck asked Margaret to call Lighthouse Realty and get the agent on the phone.

Lighthouse Realty confirmed what Graseck suspected. There was no order to remove the listing.

Graseck told Lighthouse to restore the listing at least until Exum filed his oath.

When Lighthouse realized that they were duped by Exum, they tried to honor their contractual obligation by re-instating the listing. Lighthouse Realty's attempt failed when it was discovered that another realtor already had the listing.

On April 22nd an email was sent which pictured the wife of NYS Supreme Court Justice William J. Kent, as the real estate agent for Margaret Besen's home. (See Attachments)

The listing agent pictured has since been changed but the broker with the business remains the same.

The motion, which will decide the fate of the wife, Margaret Besen, is scheduled to be heard by Judge William J. Kent, at the Cohalan Courthouse in Central Islip, NY, on April 29, 2014.

Contacts:



Margaret R. Besen; 631-626-0120
Curtis R. Exum, Esq.; 631-232-2580
Judge William J. Kent; 631-853-5471
Arthur V. Graseck, Esq.; 631-277-6543
Lighthouse Realty Group; Roberta Franzese; 631-696-4500
Realty Connect USA; Patricia Kent; 631-881-5601

August 13, 2014 at 2:39 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:


               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
         
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2
Worthy of Review: Click here to see 'Sex Scandal at Attorney Ethics Committee'


Worthy of Review: Click here to see 'NY Attorney pleads guilty to federal felony; Gets law license back'
Add to Technorati Favorites