MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email:

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Federal Prosecutor Slams Two Crooked Fen-Phen Lawyers

Big Money in Fat

The following story out of Kentucky, "Lawyers accused of fraud in fen-phen case," appears to be raising some interest in Manhattan after a re-review of the audio tapes in the Luisa Esposito case where attorney Allen Isaac apparently had the juice to influence a bunch of appellate jurists at the Appellate Division, First Department, in a reported fen-phen case being heard on appeal. The Esposito tapes reportedly quote New York attorney Allen Isaac with some very troubling insight:    

  • "Yesterday, I was in the Appellate Court, First Department, not the Second Department--the Second Department is tougher than the First Department."
  • "I was in the First Department there were 16 cases and my case was the last. I wasn't arguing it, but the client wanted me to be there because some of the judges on the panel are very close to me. So, I wanted them [the appellate judges] to know that I'm really interested in the case. This is all bullshit politics, and they saw me, so I wanted them to know that I'm really interested in that case. That case, you know, is worth $200 million dollars, not this."

Lawyers accused of fraud in fen-phen case
UPI (United Press International) April 2, 2009

FRANKFORT, Ky., April 2 (UPI) -- Attorneys William Gallion and Shirley Cunningham Jr. defrauded their clients in a diet-drug case out of $94.6 million, an assistant U.S. attorney alleges. Assistant U.S. Attorney E.J. Walbourn said in U.S. District Court the two defendants facing wire fraud charges allegedly took an unfair percentage of a $200 million settlement of a 2001 case involving the diet drug, fen-phen, The (Louisville, Ky.) Courier-Journal said Thursday. The settlement came after the anti-obesity drug was pulled from U.S. pharmacies after it was found to cause heart valve damage in consumers. Lawyer Hale Almand, who is representing Gallion in the ongoing fraud case, insists his client merely followed the advice of class-action attorney Stan Chesley in settling the 2001 class-action suit. "They relied on Stan Chesley to tell them what they should and shouldn't do," Almand said of Gallion and Cunningham. "And there is no doubt that much of the advice given by Chesley was bad advice." The Courier-Journal said the legal duo's last trial ended last July with a hung jury.

Here's the FBI's Press Release:

United States Attorney James A. Zerhusen
Eastern District of Kentucky

CONTACT: KYLE EDELEN  - PHONE: (859) 685-4811


FRANKFORT, KY—Two Fen-Phen Lawyers accused of hoarding $94 million from their clients were convicted today by a jury in U.S. District Court in Frankfort, Ky. on eight counts of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit to wire fraud. The jury rendered the verdict after approximately a day and a half of deliberation. Gallion and Cunningham face a maximum prison sentence of 20 years for the conspiracy count and 20 years for each wire fraud count.

Evidence and testimony at trial established that William J. Gallion and Shirley A. Cunningham, Jr. purposely did not tell their clients the total amount of the 2001 Fen-Phen $200 million settlement. In addition, they fraudulently convinced each plaintiff to accept a low value for their claim by deliberately withholding facts of the settlement and suggesting the possibility of imprisonment to plaintiffs who revealed their individual settlement amount to others.  Evidence at trial proved that Gallion and Cunningham wired millions of dollars from an escrow account to their personal and business accounts. “These defendants got caught with their hand in the cookie jar,” said Assistant United States Attorney E.J. Walbourn during closing arguments. “The linch pin of the United States’ prosecution are the misrepresentations, false truths and downright deceit by both defendants.”

Cincinnati class action expert Stanley Chesley, who negotiated the 2001 settlement, testified that each of the 440 plaintiffs should have been told the total amount of the settlement and received full disclosure of the facts before agreeing to a sum of money in the settlement of their claims. He further testified that Gallion and Cunningham should not have taken any fees without first having filed a motion with the court and setting up a hearing during which the plaintiffs could object to the settlement amount. He additionally testified that it was wrong for the defendants to have placed $20 million into a trust fund, and that this money should have been paid to the plaintiffs in subsequent distributions. “These clients deserved what the law allowed and they didn’t receive it,” said Walbourn during the closing arguments. In February 2002, the Kentucky Bar Association Inquiry Commission began an investigation concerning the manner in which the civil settlement had been handled. The bar association requested a subpoena for the escrow account, as well as for the records of Gallion and Cunningham relating to finances.

The evidence revealed that after the request was made, money that had already been diverted to the defendants’ personal accounts was used to pay a second distribution to the plaintiffs. This second distribution was still far below the amount their clients were entitled to receive under the terms of the settlement agreement. During this second distribution, the plaintiffs were told that if there were any additional money left over, they may seek to have those additional amounts donated to a trust for charity. The victims who testified all stated they believed that the amount going to charity, if any, would be minuscule. Thereafter, the lawyers sought sealed orders from the court authorizing the establishment of the Kentucky Fund For Healthy Living and invested approximately $20 million from the settlement into the trust without the knowledge or consent of their clients. Likewise, without the knowledge and consent of their clients, they sought further sealed orders appointing themselves as paid directors of the trust with each defendant receiving approximately $5,300 a month during the life of the trust.

In July of 1998, Gallion, Cunningham and another attorney Melbourne Mills filed a civil action in Boone County Circuit Court on behalf of approximately 440 plaintiffs they represented against American Home Products (AHP), Bariatrics, Inc., and Dr. Rex Duff. As part of their representation, all three entered into contractual fee agreements with each of their clients. Gallion agreed to a fee of 33 percent of the total sum recovered by his clients before expenses; Cunningham agreed to 33 and one-third percent of the total sum recovered by his clients before expenses and Mills agreed to a fee of no more than 30 percent of his clients’ net recovery after expenses. The case was subsequently certified as a class action, and in May 2001, the case was settled through mediation. AHP agreed to pay the 440 plaintiffs more than $200 million.  James A. Zerhusen, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky and Timothy D. Cox, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, jointly made the announcement today after the jury returned the verdict.


Anonymous said...

I heard the Phen-Phen case settled for a little less than ONE BILLION DOLLARS..I heard Napoli & Burns was also also involved in screwing their clients out of money that was owed to them....So, when are the FEDS coming to NY to get some of the dirty lawyers that were involved in swiddling their clients out of the money...Oh, but wait some of those clients have since passed away...What freaking CROOKS..How do these thieves sleep at night?

Anonymous said...

This case also involved the Law Firm of PARKER & WAICHMAN..I heard that NAPOLI & BURNS screwed Parker & Waichman's clients out of money from the Phen-Phen case.

porn star said...

Now the picture is coming in clearer. Mr. Isaac only wanted "30 seconds of [oral sex] pleasure," in return for his legal representation, not because he's the 'anti-stud' but because he was too busy paying off corrupt appellate judges. Now I understand. Mr. Isaac is indeed the star of ATTORNEY GIVES NEW MEANING TO ORAL ARGUMENT !! Go, Allen, you're a stud!

Anonymous said...

Where there's big money, you'll find a lot of lawyers who are connected to a lot of judges. And guess who wins most of those cases. Correct.

Anonymous said...

Why isn't this story on the front page? Every community was a victim and this should be BIG news.

Anonymous said...

This case sounds like Allen Isaac, and the Law Firm of Napoli, & Burn's are also involved with that Kentucky case..Bring down the indictments in New York now!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

When is my friend Luisa going to see justice? I get the feeling that your Constitution and Bill of Rights was written by men or privilage for men of privilage and everone else has to sufer injustice at the hands of a bunch of crooks. You have a criminal justice system that's akin to that of a 3rd world despotic dictatorship. Shame on you.

Anonymous said...




Anonymous said...





Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:

               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2
Add to Technorati Favorites