MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email: CorruptCourts@gmail.com

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Growing Epidemic: NY Judges Bucking Old Corrupt Club Rules

The trend is only undesirable to the blood-sucking bar's number one rule: legal fees. In a return to the rule of law, a growing number of judge's are doing what's right, and speaking their conscience. Give judges a long-overdue raise, and return integrity and respect to every judicial position. Support judges who buck the corrupt 'orders' of spineless political hacks.  The Legal System should NOT be about legal fees, but about Fairness, Due Process and Equal Justice--- for everyone, including judges.

Schack Cites Judicial Pay Stall as Reason for Recusal

The New York Law Journal by Mark Fass -  March 10, 2009

A Brooklyn judge has recused himself from a receivership case where the plaintiff is represented by a law firm that employs two state lawmakers, one of whom voted against a judicial pay raise. In a scathing 10-page decision, Supreme Court Justice Arthur M. Schack (See Profile) wrote that it would be improper for him, as a petitioner in an action against the Legislature seeking raises for judges, to adjudicate an action in which the firm has a stake. "To avoid any potential appearance of impropriety in the instant case, since both Senator Craig M. Johnson and Assembly Member Marc S. Alessi are both of counsel to Jaspan Schelsinger Hoffman . . . I must recuse myself," Justice Schack wrote in JPMorgan Chase v. Bergen Plaza, 126/09. The Brooklyn Supreme Court decision will be published Thursday. "I hope that Mr. Johnson and Mr. Alessi would allow the judges of this state to receive their first pay raise in this century. Thanks to our legislators . . . our New York State judges are the 'Rodney Dangerfields' of government. A pay raise would help to give us a little respect, instead of, as recently said by Chief Judge Kaye, 'the disdain with which we are treated.'"

Justice Schack's recusal order is yet another salvo in the fight for pay increases for New York's approximately 1,300 trial judges, who have not received a raise since 1999, when the Legislature bumped their salaries to $136,700 a year. No state has gone longer without raising judicial pay; according to one study, New York ranks 48th in judicial pay when adjusted for the cost of living. Last May, then-Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye, a leading advocate for judicial raises, e-mailed the entire state judiciary, advising her fellow judges that they may recuse themselves as a matter of "individual conscience," but that a "strategy" of recusals could "hurt our cause" (NYLJ, May 2, 2008).

Two weeks later, the state Commission on Judicial Conduct warned that judges who recuse themselves to protest legislative inaction could face disciplinary actions. The County Judges Association of the State of New York then adopted a resolution supporting "the recusal of any New York State Judges, as a matter of personal conscience, in regard to their ability to be fair and impartial due to the controversy surrounding Judicial compensation." Though no one keeps an official count of the recusals, Steven W. Schlesinger told the Law Journal last year that in a three-month period about 20 judges recused themselves from cases involving his firm. Yesterday, he did not return a call for comment.  In one such case, Trump on the Ocean, LLC v. Cortes-Vasquez, 5329-08, then-Nassau Supreme Justice Leonard B. Austin granted a potential intervenor's motion for recusal.

"The integrity of the judicial process requires that all attorneys and their clients believe that the decisions of this or any other court are based upon the facts and the law and not some issue in an unrelated matter which can be perceived as affecting the Court's impartiality or sense of fairness," Justice Austin wrote. Last week Justice Austin was appointed to the Appellate Division, Second Department. In the present action before Justice Schack, JPMorgan Chase, the plaintiff, sought the appointment of a receiver for a bankrupt Brooklyn shopping plaza. Justice Schack recused himself, citing his status as a plaintiff in Maron v. Silver, 06-021984, which seeks an increase in judicial salaries to $169,300. He wrote that it would neither be proper nor appear proper for him to rule on a case involving Jaspan Schlesinger, where both Mr. Johnson and Mr. Alessi are counsel. Mr. Alessi voted against the raises; the issue has not come to a vote before the Assembly.

"Both Senator Johnson and Assemblyman Alessi have the right to earn additional income, unlike judges," Justice Schack wrote. "It is high time for [them] to realize that the approximately 1300 New York State judges are working people who deserve their first pay raise in more than a decade." According to a spokesman for the Office of Court Administration, JPMorgan Chase will now go to Justice Abraham Gerges, Brooklyn's administrative judge, for reassignment. Antonia Donohue of Jaspan Schlesinger represented the plaintiffs, JPMorgan Chase. She declined to comment.  The defendant, Bergen Plaza, did not answer the complaint. Its phone has been disconnected and no one responded to an e-mail requesting comment. The judges' pay-raise suit, Maron, is not faring well. In December 2007, Albany Supreme Court Justice Thomas J. McNamara dismissed all but one claim (NYLJ, Dec. 3, 2007). The Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed 4-1, and the judges are now seeking leave to appeal (NYLJ, Nov. 14, 2008).

There are two other lawsuits seeking higher pay for judges.  Larabee v. Silver, 112301/07, was filed in Manhattan Supreme Court in September 2007 on behalf of the New York City Family Court Association, the state Family Court Judges Association, the New York City Civil Court Judges Association and the New York City Criminal Court Judges Association. In Kaye v. Silver, 400763/08, filed in April 2008, Judge Kaye claimed the Legislature denied the judges their constitutional right to an adequate salary.  Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Edward Lehner is now considering a motion for summary judgment and a motion to dismiss in Kaye.  Justice Lehner's denial of the government's motion for summary judgment in Larabee has been appealed to the Appellate Division, First Department. Mark.Fass@incisivemedia.com

CLICK HERE TO SEE RELATED STORY, HERO JUDGE OF THE DAY, "Judge Cuts Firm's Fees for Receiver Role by 20 Percent"

CLICK HERE TO SEE RELATED STORY, "Hero Judge of the Day: Hon. Joseph W. Bellacosa"

6 comments:

brooklyn limo driver said...

I applaud Judge Schack. The law is about doing what is right, not just lining the pockets of law firms associated with firms like Jaspan Schelsinger. For too long judges have been forced to look at the names of the law firms and not the facts, law or evidence in a case. This MUST STOP.

Are you getting the message Shelly Silver? The public is fed up with your greed and mismanagement. We don't want tolls to fund your mistakes, and you will no longer go into court thinking you'll get big legal fees. It's about justice, Shelly, not your and your fellow lawyer's greedy pocket.

retired judge said...

Be careful Judge Schack. The king of all hacks, Bob Tembeckjian, will soon be crawling up your behind. He's a ruthless liar and he destroys judges who go against the corruptive fold. Be strong

sleuth said...

One Judge getting religion does not make a change but it is a good start.

Anonymous said...

I am not for blanket judicial raises..without strict across the board accountability....first.

Our judicial system has festered in the Kaye Corruption for 16 yrs and many Robes have taken complete advantage of this system of law and justice through illegal, unethical and tax stealing methods...and they will assuredly only get worse if we pay them more!

The Judges do receive raises...they are just not recognized as such...because Kaye manipulated them into the budget...as allowances, shorter workdays...even shorter work weeks...and they take home well over six figures for doing this part time job. Remember..the law and court clerks do most of the heavy lifting.

Until someone addresses this system relative to the the horrors we discuss on this blog...as
a taxpayer...I vote absolutely NO..to any judicial raises. Let the "good" Judges stand up now....and jump start that expose..to save their own careers and our system of honor and justice.

Anonymous said...

Obama is considering pay onuses for exceptional teachers. Not as simple for judges, but is it possible to have a merit based pay scale.

First order of business: replace Tembeckjian with an honest person.

Anonymous said...

You can have merit based pay for the judiciary, you just need to ask the people that work for them.
We all know what they do and do not "choose" to know.
The knowledge they retained from law school and a little from other employment, is the only knowledge they choose to accept when they have been favored with a political judgship. I know...I worked with many of them for many, many years!

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:


               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
         
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2