MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email: CorruptCourts@gmail.com

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Madoff Waives Indictment, Set to Plead Guilty

Madoff Waives Indictment, Set to Plead Guilty
The New York Law Journal by Mark Hamblett - March 8, 2009

Bernard L. Madoff appears set to plead guilty in the multi-billion Ponzi scheme that shocked the nation. Mr. Madoff, 70, is scheduled to appear before Southern District Judge Denny Chin at 10 a.m. on Thursday and is expected to be arraigned on an information and, absent a change of heart, enter a guilty plea. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marc Litt and Lisa Baroni Friday morning informed Judge Chin that the government will file an information upon Mr. Madoff's waiver of indictment. Mr. Madoff's attorney, Daniel J. Horwitz of Dickstein Shapiro, confirmed Friday that Mr. Madoff would indeed waive indictment. Lead defense lawyer Ira L. Sorkin declined to discuss details or even whether his client would actually plead, saying only, "The document speaks for itself." 

Friday's notice of intent to file an information was filed one week before a March 13 deadline to indict Mr. Madoff under the Speedy Trial Act. One issue the parties must resolve before any plea is the allegations by prosecutors that Mr. Sorkin is laboring under a conflict of interest in his representation of Mr. Madoff.  Mr. Sorkin disputes there is a conflict but said that, in any event, he believes the prosecution would not object to Mr. Madoff waiving any future claim that a conflict rendered his counsel ineffective.

Under this scenario, the prosecutors would merely want the defendant to make a clear waiver to ensure that any guilty plea could not be attacked later by Mr. Madoff on the grounds that Mr. Sorkin was hamstrung by the conflict.  A hearing on the conflict issue under United States v. Curcio, 680 F.2d 881 (2d Cir. 1982), has been scheduled for tomorrow at 3 p.m. before Judge Chin. The potential conflict stems from the fact that Mr. Sorkin's late father had an account with Mr. Madoff and Mr. Sorkin represented the principals of Avellino & Bienes, an investment firm that funneled its clients' money to Mr. Madoff and was sued by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 1992.

Mr. Madoff was arrested on Dec. 11 on one count of securities fraud. After initially being allowed to walk free on $10 million bail, he was ordered confined to his Park Avenue penthouse for all but court appearances. He wears an electronic monitoring bracelet and his front door is watched around-the-clock by security guards. Mr. Madoff angered prosecutors by mailing more than $1 million in jewelry to family and friends in late December, a move that prompted Mr. Litt to seek to have bail revoked. Magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis and then Judge Lawrence McKenna refused to order detention (NYLJ Jan. 15, 2009). But the bail calculus could be altered by a decision by Mr. Madoff to plead guilty.  Mr. Litt could then argue, now before a new judge, that the defendant faces what is in essence a life sentence in prison and, with the end drawing near, has every incentive to flee. If Judge Chin agrees with Judge McKenna, however, Mr. Madoff could still remain out of jail until he is sentenced.

Judge McKenna found in January that the possibility of Mr. Madoff fleeing was "as close to nil as you can get at this point."  In the vast majority of cases where the defendant waives indictment and pleads guilty to an information, the defendant has entered into a cooperation agreement with prosecutors, hoping to receive in return a 5K.1 letter from the government. The letter informs the sentencing judge that the defendant performed substantial assistance in the investigation and prosecution of others in the ongoing criminal case and should therefore be considered for a lower sentence. It is only the rare case where the defendant opts to plead guilty to an information without an agreement, and that is because the evidence is overwhelming and the defendant is seeking a measure of goodwill from the judge at sentencing. It is not clear into which category Mr. Madoff fits.

Extent of Fraud

Mr. Madoff is alleged to have admitted his crimes to his sons and then later to the FBI officer who came to arrest him.  Prosecutors are attempting to find out who else was involved in the scheme, but because Mr. Madoff is the mastermind of what might be the most notorious financial crime in history, it is hard to see the government willing to exchange anything of value for information that convicts lesser actors, and certainly not a lighter sentence. One attorney said it would be "extraordinary" for the government to make that kind of offer given the high-profile nature of the case and the scope of Mr. Madoff's crimes.

Mr. Madoff, through his attorneys, claims to have been working with the government by providing details needed to help locate assets and unravel the fraud. If Mr. Madoff has pledged to cooperate with the government in a plea deal, it would signal that the government considers the investigation far from over and may be close to obtaining charges against others in the scheme. Several legal observers say it is clear Mr. Madoff will plead guilty. Veteran defense attorney Elkan Abramowitz of Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer said Friday's filing of the notice by the prosecutors indicates an agreement to plead guilty. "If he had not already agreed to plead, you can't file an information on a felony charge because only a grand jury can charge felonies," Mr. Abramowitz said. "We know that he has agreed to at least waive indictment and I'm not aware of any situation where that hasn't already included an agreement to plead guilty." An information will normally contain fewer counts and be less complicated than an indictment, Mr. Abramowitz said.  In any event, even if Mr. Madoff has reached an agreement to plead guilty to an information, there is nothing that prevents him from changing his mind.

Victims of Fraud

Meanwhile, Stephen Harbeck of the Securities Investor Protection Corp. told The Associated Press that checks were sent on Friday to two investors who were victims of Mr. Madoff's fraud. The Securities Investor Protection Corp. is an industry-funded organization that steps in when a brokerage firm fails. It has been helping process hundreds of claims by investors hoping to recoup losses. Investors are eligible for up to $500,000 from the organization, and have until July to file claims. Mr. Harbeck would not disclose how much money was sent to the first two investors to receive checks. Mark.Hamblett@incisivemedia.com

5 comments:

Brooklyn Schumer Victim said...

What about the "officers of the courts" who were upholding the law in the Madoff companies? Why aren't a bunch of lawyers in handcuffs? And another name comes to mind: a guy named SCHUMER. I heard Bernie had a lot to say to the feds about good 'ole Chuckie. Another fun-filled week is in the works!

Anonymous said...

And he'll probably be sentenced to a penthouse on 64th at Lexington Avenue. What a joke.

Anonymous said...

How do I sign-up for a Madoff style sentence? Yes, yes. I'm guilty of..... anything, everything. Put me in a 7 million dollar penthouse.

Anonymous said...

I heard that Madoff ripped off the Russian mob as well.If he were put in prison he would be dead inside a week.I know,who cares, but we do want to find any money,if there is any left.

Pogo said...

he copped a plea and the Feds are going along with it because they want this to go away since they look like the fools that they are.

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:


               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
         
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2