G-Men Bid to Bounce Bernie Madoff's Lawyer From Case
The New York Law Journal by Mark Hamblett - March 4, 2009
A hearing is scheduled for today on the claim of federal prosecutors that the attorney for Bernard Madoff, Ira Sorkin of Dickstein Shapiro, is laboring under a conflict of interest in his representation of the accused operator of a multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme. Southern District Judge Leonard Sand will hear from both sides on whether there is an actual conflict. If he finds one, he will then go on to inquire whether Mr. Madoff would waive any rights to claim the conflict affected the quality of his defense. It has been reported that one alleged conflict is that Mr. Sorkin represented two accountants in a 1992 case brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accountants were later linked to Mr. Madoff. Another reason for the hearing is that Mr. Sorkin's name was on a list of more than 13,000 client accounts in the bankruptcy filing of Bernard L. Madoff Securities. Mr. Sorkin told the Law Journal last month that the account referred to in the bankruptcy filing belonged to his late father and then his mother. The reason Mr. Sorkin's name appeared on the list was that his mother's mail was sent to his house for several years. "There is no conflict because I was never a client, customer or had any beneficial interest in an account at the Madoff firm," he said.
MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"
End Corruption in the Courts!
Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email: CorruptCourts@gmail.com
Most Read Stories
- Tembeckjian's Corrupt Judicial 'Ethics' Commission Out of Control
- As NY Judges' Pay Fiasco Grows, Judicial 'Ethics' Chief Enjoys Public-Paid Perks
- New York Judges Disgraced Again
- Wall Street Journal: When our Trusted Officials Lie
- Massive Attorney Conflict in Madoff Scam
- FBI Probes Threats on Federal Witnesses in New York Ethics Scandal
- Federal Judge: "But you destroyed the faith of the people in their government."
- Attorney Gives New Meaning to Oral Argument
- Wannabe Judge Attorney Writes About Ethical Dilemmas SHE Failed to Report
- 3 Judges Covered Crony's 9/11 Donation Fraud
- Former NY State Chief Court Clerk Sues Judges in Federal Court
- Concealing the Truth at the Attorney Ethics Committee
- NY Ethics Scandal Tied to International Espionage Scheme
- Westchester Surrogate's Court's Dastardly Deeds
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(554)
-
▼
March
(58)
- NY Ethics 'April Fools' Joke Ready
- Would-Be Judge Admits Theft
- Great News: New York is Corrupt AND Dysfunctional
- NY Daily News: NY Lawmakers Worst of Worst
- Prosecutorial Misconduct and Corruption of Justice
- Chief Judge Lippman: Judges Matter
- Six NY Lawyers Busted for Not Paying Taxes
- Rate Your Judge on "Robe Probe"
- Morganthau Reportedly Taking Second Look at 'bad' ...
- Trial Lawyers' Boon
- Fifteen Years of Hell Over: Governor Paterson Appo...
- Governor Asked to Confront Presiding Judge Candida...
- Mayor Considers Martial Law Over Police Corruption...
- Governor Must Ask Presiding Judge Candidates About...
- Journal News Editorial: More Light on "Sunshine"
- True Oversight Returning to NY, via Inspector Gene...
- Fox News: Aging Judges Still on Bench
- Federal Judges Meet in Secret, As Usual
- Kickbacks. Pay-to-Play. In New York ?!?!
- Another Proud Day for New York Lawyers
- Criminal Judge Drops Charges Against Federal Judge
- Court-Appointed Corruption: A National Problem
- Nasty, Corrupt Lawyer Facing Payback
- Governor Right to Dump Useless Ethics Group
- Castigated Judge Known as Fair, Faithful Man
- Push for Madoff to Sing about Schumer-like Ties, A...
- Another Lawyer Accused of Screwing With Property Deed
- Thug, Just Admonished by Judge, Arrested for Fraud...
- NYLJ: Lippman Shakes Up Court Administration
- NY BigLaw Firm Lays Off 25 Attorneys
- 'Officer of Court' Admits to Bribery
- BigLaw Firm Ponies Up $10 Million to Settle Malpra...
- MADOFF CHARGED IN ELEVEN-COUNT CRIMINAL INFORMATION
- Madoff to Plead Guilty in Largest U.S. Ponzi Schem
- FORMER CONGRESSIONAL AIDE PLEADS GUILTY TO HONEST ...
- Serpico on Today's Corruption
- Growing Epidemic: NY Judges Bucking Old Corrupt Cl...
- Wanted: More Judges Like This
- Can Judges Be Bought?
- Madoff Waives Indictment, Set to Plead Guilty
- Law and Man-Hating County Attorney's Office Sued
- Balls: Disrobed Judge Still Gets "Robe Allowance"
- Corrupt Administrative Judge Stayed by Appellate D...
- Governor Announces Judicial Appointments
- Suit Accuses Officials of Land Scheme
- Lawyers Support Embattled Bruno, Ignore Widespread...
- U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Asked to Appoint...
- Call New York State Senator John L. Sampson TODAY
- Chief Judge Lippman Wants You to Like Him
- Fraudulent Fun in Westchester, the Epicenter of Ne...
- Shake-Up Begins at Manhattan DA's Office
- G-Men Bid to Boot Madoff's Lawyer
- U.S. Supreme Court Considers When a Judge Should B...
- Destroying Our Faith in Our Government
- Attorney Pleads Guilty To Bribery, Tax Charges
- Ethics Panel Cover-Up, Fraud, and Now Layoffs, Pla...
- U.S. Supreme Court Case May Define Whan a Judge Mu...
- Clerk of Courts' Son Arrested after Meth Lab Found...
-
▼
March
(58)
See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
2 comments:
Hell, boot ALL the lawyers, including the judge. Move this case to Omaha.
These are not real conflicts. Courts routinely accept far more serious conflicts than what appears hear. My suspicion is that the case is not going very well for the prosecutors - notice the repeated delay in formerly charging Madoff. While the case appears publicly airtight it is frought with serious problems for the prosecutors. Remember Madoff gave himself in. As a result the prosecutors had no investigation going on this case. In effect other than Madoff "confession" the prosecutors had no idea what is going on. Second the shear enormity of this financial crime. Third, and the prosecutors don't want to admit these financial crimes often involve areas practice that they are not familiar with. The prosecutors have a number of goals that are clearly not being met. Obtaining convictions of others different from Madoff - its impossible to believe Madoff did this crime by himself. Find more funds for restitution to the victims and establish where were the institutional failures were and if they are any criminal involvement. This motion is a smoke screen that demonstrates that Sorkin is probably outmaneurvering the prosecutors leading to this motion of frustration as the only person they have is Madoff who gave himself up and they cannot meet their other goals. I don't expect this case to be ready for at least a year. It is an institutional embarrassment that this crime could go one for so long with no government entity be aware of it, even with the help of whistleblower.
Post a Comment