MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email:

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Attorney Tax Shelter Fraud Convictions Flavor Financial Crisis

Former Attorney, Two Others Convicted of Tax Shelter Charges
The New York Law Journal by Mark Hamblett - December 18, 2008

A former lawyer was among three of the four remaining defendants in the KPMG tax shelter case convicted yesterday by a Manhattan federal jury. Raymond Ruble, who once was a partner at Brown & Wood, was convicted on 10 counts of tax evasion while investment consultants Robert Pfaff and John Larson were convicted on 12 counts. Each defendant faces five years on each count when they are sentenced March 20 by Southern District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. The hundreds of millions of dollars the government claimed was lost in tax revenue from the bogus shelters is expected to factor into Judge Kaplan's calculation on appropriate sentences. David Greenberg, an ex-KPMG partner, was acquitted yesterday on all counts.

Mr. Greenberg, who was jailed for more than five months following his arrest, wore a look of relief as he offered brief words of consolation to his co-defendants. He then left the courtroom ahead of his lawyers, Richard Strassberg and David B. Pitofsky of Goodwin Procter. "David Greenberg was innocent, he is innocent and the jury found that to be the case," Mr. Strassberg said. "We've had three years of horrible injustice against Mr. Greenberg." The trial began on Oct. 13 and the jury deliberated for a full week, weighing a large volume of evidence in a complex case, before reaching its decision. Judge Kaplan ordered Mr. Pfaff and Mr. Larson to home confinement and electronic monitoring while they await sentencing. Mr. Ruble remains free on bail. All three men were acquitted of a conspiracy to defraud the Internal Revenue Service as well as a single count on one kind of tax shelter. Mr. Ruble was acquitted on two counts involving one tax shelter. The guilty verdicts brought a measure of vindication for the Southern District U.S. Attorney's Office, which had seen most of the defendants in what was billed as the largest tax fraud prosecution in U.S. history dismissed by Judge Kaplan last year on interference with the right to counsel. Prosecutors John Hillebrecht and Margaret Garnett succeeded in persuading the jury that the tax shelter known as BLIPS had no legitimate business justification.

A scheme that was motivated by "greed," Mr. Hillebrecht told the jury, worked this way: Mr. Larson and Mr. Pfaff, formerly of KPMG, marketed the tax shelter to KPMG clients, and Mr. Ruble provided hundreds of opinion letters to the clients saying the shelters were more than likely to hold up in court if challenged by the IRS. Mr. Ruble received $50,000 per letter. The BLIPS tax shelter was, on the surface, a seven-year "investment" that was tied to the unlikely event that foreign currencies would be depegged from the U.S. dollar. In reality, all of the wealthy clients who made an investment in what Mr. Hillebrecht called a "magic tax elimination machine" ended their transactions in 60 days and acquired a huge paper loss to offset millions in capital gains. A key to Mr. Greenberg's defense was the cross-examination of California accountant Steven Acosta, who was brought forth by the prosecution to show that Mr. Greenberg had fraudulent intent in the selling of a tax shelter called SOS. Mr. Acosta was exposed as a liar during cross, a fact that led to a remarkable admission by Mr. Hillebrecht during his rebuttal closing argument. "And let there be no doubt about it, not that I thought that there was any, Steven Acosta was a catastrophe," Mr. Hillebrecht said. "Steve Acosta got destroyed on cross-examination by Mr. Strassberg." After telling the jury that "Mr. Strassberg will be telling that story for years," Mr. Hillebrecht said that, while watching Mr. Acosta on cross, "I wanted to crawl under the table." Mr. Acosta also appalled Judge Kaplan, who said afterwards that Mr. Greenberg had suffered "an injustice."

In June, 2006, Judge Kaplan found the government "let its zeal get in the way of its judgment," and "violated the Constitution it is sworn to defend" by using its leverage to force the accounting firm to stop paying attorney's fees for indicted partners and employees (NYLJ, June 28, 2006). KPMG, the judge said, was facing extinction unless it cooperated with the government and was willing to bend over backwards and change its legal fee policy, thereby interfering with the right to counsel, and for some, the right to counsel of their choice. The firm escaped with a deferred prosecution agreement, paid a huge fine, and a single charge of conspiracy was dropped against the firm in 2006. In 2007, Judge Kaplan dismissed charges against 13 defendants, a decision that was upheld four months ago by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (NYLJ, Aug. 29). The circuit agreed with Judge Kaplan that the Sixth Amendment was violated when the government caused "KPMG to place conditions on the advancement of legal fees" and to "cap fees and ultimately end them." It endorsed the dismissal of the indictment as the only remedy for the constitutional violation, leaving only Messrs. Larson, Pfaff, Greenberg and Ruble in the case.

U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia and his staff weighed whether to seek a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court, but decided against it and allowed a late-November filing deadline to expire. Against the remaining defendants, Judge Kaplan whittled the charges down at the close of the government's case, dismissing the SOS counts against the three men who were ultimately convicted and the BLIPS counts against Mr. Greenberg - all for insufficiency of evidence, Mr. Strassberg said. The convicted defendants and their lawyers left the courtroom without comment. In the final tally for the case, 19 defendants were charged, two pleaded guilty, 13 had charges dismissed, three were convicted at trial and one acquitted. Mr. Ruble is represented by Jack S. Hoffinger and Susan Hoffinger of Hoffinger, Stern & Ross and Stuart Abrams of Frankel & Abrams. Mr. Pfaff is represented by David C. Scheper of Overland Borenstein Scheper & Kim in Los Angeles. Mr. Larson was represented by Thomas A. Hagemann of Gardere Wynne Sewell in Houston.


Anonymous said...

This is a whitewash job, the coverup continues. The US attorney's office doesn't want to go where they should. There are top white shoes firms that are involved along with the banks. Where was the oversight? Medoff is a continuation of the same problem.

Anonymous said...

another fraud by officers of the courts. new york is the worst.

Anonymous said...

When are these guys going to be disbarred like forevermore???

Anonymous said...

You forget that lawyers have been taught that their role- especially in New York- is to CIRCUMVENT THE LAW, not act within it.

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:

               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2
Add to Technorati Favorites