MLK said: "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

End Corruption in the Courts!

Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of June 15, 2016, we've received over 142,500 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !! Email:

Monday, August 3, 2009

Respected Judge Pleads Guilty In Bribery Scheme

He prosecuted Medgar Evers' killer; now faces jail
The (Miss.) Clarion-Ledger by Jerry Mitchell August 1, 2009

JACKSON, Miss. — He was an internationally acclaimed prosecutor before becoming a well-respected judge on the Hinds County bench. Now Circuit Judge Bobby DeLaughter is expected to take his seat behind bars after pleading guilty Thursday to obstruction of justice for lying to an FBI agent investigating corruption. A sentencing date has not been set. It will be before U.S. District Judge Glen Davidson. DeLaughter's plea agreement calls for him to serve 18 months in prison. The remaining four counts of mail fraud conspiracy and involvement in a bribery scheme have been dismissed as part of that agreement. However, Davidson has the leeway to reject the agreement. If he does, DeLaughter can withdraw his guilty plea and go to trial. It is the tragic end to what seemed like a fairy tale career, captured in part in the 1996 Rob Reiner film, Ghosts of Mississippi, which described events leading to the successful reprosecution in 1994 of Klansman Byron De La Beckwith. DeLaughter penned a book about the experience, Never Too Late, in which he talked about overcoming impossible odds to prosecute Beckwith, who shot NAACP leader Medgar Evers in the back in 1963. Evers' brother, Charles, said he's saddened to see DeLaughter plead guilty. In prosecuting Beckwith, DeLaughter "lost a lot of friends," he said. "To me, it's such a terrible thing to see him go out like this. I just hope when the judge sentences him, he will look at the good things he's done in the past, not just with Medgar." As a judge, DeLaughter has drawn praise for work, moving his docket quickly and handling as many as 1,200 cases in a year. And he has been praised for his innovations, getting bad check writers to work off their debts, rather than sending them to prison for eight years or more. The case DeLaughter pleaded guilty to Thursday involved multimillionaire Dickie Scruggs, who earned his fortune through settlements of mass torts against asbestos and tobacco companies and also was portrayed in a Hollywood movie — the 1999 film, The Insider.

Scruggs had already pleaded guilty to attempting to bribe DeLaughter in a legal fees lawsuit filed by Scruggs' former partner, Bob Wilson. According to prosecutors, the bribe itself was not money, but Scruggs recommending DeLaughter for a federal judgeship to his brother-in-law, then-U.S. senatorTrent Lott. A Lott spokesman has said the senator made a "courtesy call" to DeLaughter and that DeLaughter was never seriously considered for the position. Lott recommended someone else. DeLaughter has vehemently denied he took any bribe, money or otherwise, and has repeatedly insisted he ruled according to law in Scruggs' case. According to his attorneys, he passed a lie-detector test in which he said he was never influenced in the case. But Thursday, DeLaughter admitted he lied to FBI agents in 2007 when he said he "never spoke with" his former boss, one-time Hinds County District Attorney Ed Peters, about the Wilson case. The Scruggs' legal team has said they hired Peters to influence DeLaughter. "I'm pleased to see another of the wrongdoers brought to justice," said Wilson's lawyer, Charlie Merkel of Clarksdale, Miss., who attended Thursday's hearing. "I can't imagine a more despicable act by a judicial official," Merkel said. DeLaughter's plea shows that the story told by then-lawyers Joey Langston and Tim Balducci is true, he said.

Wilson and another former law partner, Alwyn Luckey, sued Scruggs in 1994 for legal fees they say Scruggs owed them from asbestos litigation. In 2005, a federal magistrate judge ordered Scruggs to pay $17 million to Luckey. The next year, a special master in Hinds County Circuit Court recommended Scruggs also owed back legal fees to Wilson, prompting Wilson's lawyers to ask for $15 million. In recent sworn testimony, Balducci described how they retained Peters to influence DeLaughter and how they would send possible pleadings to Peters — only to get back marked up copies for revisions. DeLaughter eventually rejected the special master's recommendation, concluding Scruggs owed Wilson no more than a belated $1.5 million payment. Balducci said DeLaughter ruled in the end that Scruggs owed zero, despite a lack of any documentation. "If you look back, in the history of that case, the boxes and boxes, and volumes of documents in that case and all of the orders issued by Judge DeLaughter in that case, that order, singularly, is the only order that he ever entered with no support, no reasoning, no grounds, no basis," Balducci said. DeLaughter is expected to lose his law license and his seat on the bench. He has been suspended with pay from the bench since March 2008 pending an investigation by the state Commission on Judicial Performance. His judicial salary is more than $104,000.

Peters, who received $1 million from Scruggs for his work, received immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony against DeLaughter, whom he once joined forces with to prosecute Beckwith. As part of his cooperation, Peters turned over $425,000 remaining from the $1 million along with his law license. Matt Steffey, professor of Mississippi College School of Law, is among those angered that Peters — who has endured his share of investigations and charges — has dodged a conviction again. He believes what's happened to DeLaughter resembles a Shakespearean tragedy. "Unlike the other players in this drama, he did not gain great wealth," he said. Instead, DeLaughter's flaw was misplaced loyalty, he said. "Many people see it as tragic because but for his longtime friend and mentor, Ed Peters, initiating unlawful activity, Judge DeLaughter would remain a public servant." It was loyalty Peters himself did not display, he said. "When push came to shove, he was willing to implicate his friend in order to avoid prison time himself."


not amused said...

Sadly, this is how judicial business is now conducted in this country. Judicial business shouldn't be criminal funny business.

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Remove the word 'respected' from any connection to this bad judge

Anonymous said...

There must be new unique and powerful laws enacted relative to judicial corruption..that address this travesty with severe consequences...well beyond what ever is in place for ordinary felony crimes.

These laws must dole out mandatory incarceration for judges and "court employees" that participate in any crimes...that impede, cover-up or subvert justice in any way, shape or form.
Transcript alteration requests and compliance should be one of the highest level felonies to pay to play!

If the judiciary and court employees realize that their actions..which must also include all crimes of submission and acceptance of any and all false, altered or redacted documentation ..even if the redactions, etc present as legal...they must be shown as such...if questioned... to a higher federal court.... we will then see squealling of amazing proportions.

Perjury must also absolutely be prosecuted relative to any setting of a legal nature presently involving any court employees and judges... which is now being covered up and protected by the courts when used in protection of judicial crimes and investigations.

The courts are LOADED with liars within the legal determination of the law of perjury...and OCA is daily....granting them immunity from prosecution! I honestly believe that lying is a judicial personality quality that is searched for in job applications.. as it is truly that pervasive.

As the many cowards( some are not) that now work for OCA, claim they fear their boss when asked to illegally perform their job...they fear job loss and incarceration way more.... so their willingness to spill tons of fruit from their pie hole... would certainly manifest a lot of judicial corruption ...and the possibility that corruption would continue to perpetuate...year after year after year...would be more unlikely...if this information is regarded as doing such by the feds, after their initial investigation!

After the federal investigation is completed in NY state, and the pesent OCA employees become criminals...these laws should be legally placed by the feds, so the elimination of future massive investiations of court corruption may cease....eternally!

Blog Archive

See Video of Senator John L. Sampson's 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption

The first hearing, held in Albany on June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:

               Video of 1st Hearing on Court 'Ethics' Corruption
               The June 8, 2009 hearing is on two videos:
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 1
               CLICK HERE TO SEE Part 2
Add to Technorati Favorites